Sirens and she-devil. Tea-drinking.

[SIleM]

The sound of that inflated and that breaking virtues is named enthusiasm ()…
With entire respect, but is surrendered to me, Chertovka, that you is not completely objective. As has right down the peculiar personal life, so also Old Of rocker with the mist also. And so they have the right with the dross on the jaws to protect their rightness. (Nearly it added “not of each other”, but it recalled that here this is not claimed). I understand, that to you the views Of are nearer than the views of his enemies, but to the wall they were collected to place no one.
But virtue - not empty sound. It there is, and sometimes as in Old Of rocker', imho, it is the result of agonizing sincere evolution.
Me, in particular, it also interests, which love before this uncommon family, but me did not answer…

[ChIltAvhA]

With entire respect, but is surrendered to me, Chertovka, that you is not completely objective. As has right down the peculiar personal life, so also Old Of rocker with the mist also. And so they have the right with the dross on the jaws to protect their rightness.
… Sirens, , and where your objectivity to me? … by type they can be expressed, but I and to squeak not ? … I altogether only oppose before this dialog from my point of view just as Moroz, and other, but will otherwise solid monologs… about the sincere evolution of some and rocker including to individual theme… virtues before the Internet such abstract, then real deficiencies very concrete… moreover live as you wish not any it lives as must… moral rules they must not interfere with instinctive happiness, since morals - this is a perpetual attempt at of our personal requirements…

[SIleM]

moreover to live as you wish not any and it lives as must.
Well that you! To live as must much more difficult than to live as you wish.





moral rules must not interfere with instinctive happiness,
They must! Morals sits before each of us. Even killers know what to kill badly. Cannot be get rid besides the morals and it is dangerous. If not it, people would become wild beasts. Yes, sometimes we (and I including) consciously disregard moral norms, but this does not mean that morals it is poor or not necessary.
Another question - evolution of morals. Moral norms are changed also before always it seemed that to the worse (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)





morals - this is a perpetual attempt at the reconciliation of our personal requirements…
It is beautiful. It is debatable.





Sirens, , and where your objectivity to me? … by type they can be expressed, but I and to squeak not ? …
but you not an equal participant in the discussion, you is provided “particular authorizations”. Opinion the GDP - is simple opinion, you do think?

[CMigyro4hA]

But what this you here were sorted out? I now and do not know, where to fast…
Siren, for the sake of which morals does deal the discussion, if in them everything does proceed based on the mutual accord and based on this both do receive ? This is THEIR morals. In you it another. Here if it forced it from under the stick, and it would go for the love at the point of it down the concessions and forced its own representations about the love and the waste, then everything said by you and by rocker would have a meaning… To them to envy is possible that they are two halves of one backside, but not to condemn. Certainly it somewhere bends, but only before that plan, which and out of place about this writes to the place. But only before this. In their family - HARMONY, and assume that they attained by its not entirely standard route. Many families are generally decomposed because people they fear to acknowledge to each other before their concealed desires.
In all before the head its cockroaches, while they have these cockroaches of one species….

[ChIltAvhA]

Well that you! To live as must much more difficult than to live as you wish.
… “live must” (before the value of my post) - this to live about the rules of morals, which wrote to you and at the point of you… here this black - this is bad, it is terrible, $$… and this white - this is noticeable, biting, $$… follow one of them without the steam of and you will be either embodiment virtues or by devil before the flesh… of the third it is not given…
… to live on- gray, driving out its hue - this to cover from the radicals, to look back down the notorious public opinion, forced to play the hypocrite and to balance between “I wish” and “it is cannot”:.





moral rules must not interfere with instinctive happiness,
They must! Morals sits before each of us. Even killers know what to kill badly. Cannot be get rid besides the morals and it is dangerous. If not it, people would become wild beasts. Yes, sometimes we (and I including) consciously disregard moral norms, but this does not mean that morals it is poor or not necessary.
… and I do not negate, that the morals exists but it must be in each! … here only norm its different… they vary depending on the individual of individual… and are foolish those, who try to push strange morals beside their frames.





but you not an equal participant in the discussion, you is provided “particular authorizations”. Opinion the GDP - is simple opinion, you do think?
. .! … authorization is not prevented me from having personal opinion and do not give the law to imagine itself by authority.





But what this you here were sorted out? I now and do not know, where to fast…
Siren, for the sake of which morals does deal the discussion, if in them everything does proceed based on the mutual accord and based on this both do receive ?
So let receive who against that… I already it agreed with the position about the determination of his half and mutual happiness without treason (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)





then everything said by you and by rocker would have a meaning…
No one no one intended to teach or to teach, each absorbs post to the extent of its susceptibility. If Mr. fasts the photo of the dear wife beside , mouth and by strange peasants, then I think that right to answer before that manner, which to me nearer and more native and nothing can me before this prevent. However, i and before the thoughts do not have any to interfere with strange happiness…





To them to envy is possible that they are two halves of one backside, but not to condemn.
Let they do envy, if they do wish, who against first… can who first and to he will want, and who that to overlap oxygen before than problem? … To condemn whom that here is not also forbidden.





Certainly it somewhere bends, but only before that plan, which and out of place about this writes to the place.
Bends this softly said, matter smells besides the bringing down of surrounding to the bestial condition of the aggressive propaganda of its way of life and the acknowledgment of its point of view as singularly accurate and not subject . for this me seems it lies against the deep realization of a certain fatal error and the desire to drive in this realization beside the depth of its soul by methods known here to all.





! … authorization is not prevented me from having personal opinion and do not give the law to imagine itself by authority.
It is absolutely correct, here only function “left button of mouse” here in all absolutely different, and to strike with the people by the possessing imperious authorizations nevertheless that to be alternative to Putin on the selections with the equal time before ether isolated beside the demonstration of advertizing rollers (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
Yes even mouse first to begin to operate possibly and not , it is possible simply that to say… and it is possible also to be silent, and people which who see this it said possibly will behave a little about other…
It is possible to buy bed but not sleep, doctor but not health, sex but not love…

[ChIltAvhA]

Bends this softly said, matter smells besides the bringing down of surrounding to the bestial condition of the aggressive propaganda of its way of life and the acknowledgment of its point of view as to the singularly accurate and not subject criticism.
… and here with this I cannot but agree! … in regard to this To I admonish and patience my not is limitless… of ! … I good, but subduing jacket in me with the short sleeves…
… however this theme not for the discussion Of as propagandist and not about the imposing by them its opinion. . about the morals, the morals and virtues… for this separated semantic posts.





people which who see this it said possibly will behave a little about other…

[NATELatAL]

Bends this softly said, matter smells besides the bringing down of surrounding to the bestial condition of the aggressive propaganda of its way of life and the acknowledgment of its point of view as to the singularly accurate and not subject criticism.
and it is possible to before this place? I that the not of the propaganda of what that or, on top of that and aggressive.
So it did not note and that the point of view of is singularly accurate, where this such was or he such where that said. and all the more not subject criticism.
that I not at all understand about which this post.

[SIleM]

authorization is not prevented me from having personal opinion and do not give the law to imagine itself by authority.
… but…





I am good, but subduing jacket in me with the short sleeves…
Maybe, and you do not imagine, but you appear.

[ChIltAvhA]

Siren, ouch! … if I will beside the rag keep silent by a phobia that I will introduce bustle beside whose- that minds, then to me here it can't be helped…

[NATELatAL]

Chertovka, about the reference passed any gearing. advised it does not soar to find to itself man.
If not that it could propose itself, but it warned that the sex not without the wife.





Apropos egotism - this to the frost.

[SIleM]

Siren, for the sake of which morals does deal the discussion, if in them everything does proceed based on the mutual accord and based on this both do receive ? This is THEIR morals. In you it another.
Never them it condemned. I am surprised only what all this occurs by within the framework happy (?) family.
It is not agreeable. Moral norms are uniform (10 commandments or the moral code of the builder of communism (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)). At least, before one society. True, frequently these norms are used or are not used selectively. For those elected or for the outcasts. Double standards. And, I think, if brutal was generally accepted, with the wife would seek anything another. “I americium Of bad” - sang one - on its multiplatinum disk…
Yes indeed, imho, they and to with them feel their deviation from the norm (I please - it is not must cries! This is not crime) and this is developed, in particular, before nerve relation to publicity, before the overanxiousness of the followers of this faith (“all - to the wall”), before the desire to insult opponent.





But if not only they felt, but also realized, to associate with them would be more cognitive and it is more interesting.





Siren, ouch! … if I will beside the rag keep silent by a phobia that I will introduce bustle beside whose- that minds, then to me here it can't be helped…
“No, son, this is fantasy!” (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[ChIltAvhA]

Chertovka, about the reference passed any gearing. advised it does not soar to find to itself man.
If not that it could propose itself, but it warned that the sex not without the wife.





Apropos egotism - this to the frost.
… , you not before the courses that was there written and that I eliminated… and was there the mini story Of about the group sex, the wife, the call to lady to deprive her virginity group method and reference for its description of orgy before the theme Of …

[NATELatAL]

Chertovka, and who such of ?

[NATELatAL]

nickname in me here is already recorded)
not ? , I will record new)

[nIst]

Down all you do not react - for long, but here apropos this…
Chertovka, good- lappaceous… This like as the battle, therefore I expressed herself. Although , is clear matter, earlier it read. But before the battles I have the right to say - this is not love. This is . Blunt , when it lays the dear woman and the mother of its child under other men. Yes god for, simply I consider that so it is cannot. Because sooner or later it by its each term, which were being packed beside all respiratory and . This first. But in the second place, I here not “militant old believer”, and I do not consider that my opinion such is already unpopular. I at least know with my opinion, from whom my children. But can the same with the assurance say Mr. ?

[CMigyro4hA]

Siren, I will not dig forum in search of the proofs of the fact that you precisely these people. Although even the very fact that you speak about the amorality of the personal life Of with the wife, he speaks precisely about this.
Morals different occurs. Is morals community - as to live, so as not to fall beside the dissonance with the society, while is morals internal - as to live, so as not to fall beside the dissonance with itself. Community morals - this is those most notorious commandments “not ”, “do not steal” and the like, i.e., all that which prevents other people from living comfortably. Internal morals - this of the frames, established by person himself for itself. But if these internal frames do not go beside the section with the community - before what matter?

[fonAt]

Mist, and you have with your cavaliers clever ? Or these are not love, but the manifestation of love? Do not confuse with the tram knob we not in that century, in order to sex only on the love - now this is even not occasion for the acquaintance (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_). It lays it because by them this it pleases - love can be to, afterward and in time, but before reason investigation communications for the sake of the sex it does not participate. It !
To poke by its ? , with the same success and it by the same its can poke - this is the clearly working system of and counterbalances: “ did say? Me the crowd of ? But you type was against, to you this of the type ?!”. And respectively conversely. To so that speak here about the consequences is foolish and is not serious. And generally, human interrelations are too complex so that it would be possible to classify them by blunt labels. By the way… it is much more complex than notorious ten commandments.

[Feneboll]

And indeed which is interesting… By the how much fact appeared apropos questions of morals, morals and - before them the same persons… Including my… Well there is no newness of relations… Honestly speaking, I completely understand before the plan of the carrying out of leisure, but I do not understand before the plan of the constant diverticulum of this leisure before the people. I perfectly well understand rocker. However, it here knows how men to present position distinctly, but , I envy… I understand Moroz, with exception of the methods of conducting the conversation. I understand she-devil as to administration official - respect to you. But remaining - I do not understand completely, to be more precise, I cannot comprehend, on to thresh one and the same hundredth time… Entirely fool became on the old age of years… together with the fan…

[NATELatAL]

Down all you do not react - for long, but here apropos this…
Chertovka, good- lappaceous… This like as the battle, therefore I expressed herself. Although , is clear matter, earlier it read. But before the battles I have the right to say - this is not love. This is . Blunt , when it lays the dear woman and the mother of its child under other men. Yes god for, simply I consider that so it is cannot. Because sooner or later it by its each term, which were being packed beside all respiratory and . This first. But in the second place, I here not “militant old believer”, and I do not consider that my opinion such is already unpopular. I at least know with my opinion, from whom my children. But can the same with the assurance say Mr. ?
well statement I did not here still meet.
Never no one no one by poke will be, it is prepared to give for cut-off all anything.
I and itself am glad to lay my wife, as we made this earlier when to were, before so that by wheel all and smoke from went, now it has already been constrained, while I am here with the pleasure of collaboration before the orgies, but to I of her only when it by this without me!

[nIst]

Mist, and you have with your cavaliers clever ?
I zh harmful, and without feelings before the bed do not prove to be. Is wise whether this? knows, in it you will request. But this is MY life, and who will say that I 100% am unjust?

[Feneboll]

Mist, for itself - 100% of law, for other - 100% not of law, for me personally - not entirely law… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) as that so… So must be before any question with any people…

[fonAt]

Mist, feelings to feelings dissension - now and then people passion with the love confuse for example. But it is simply tectum it carries and to God forbid prove to be before the necessary place before the necessary time. But the main thing, as much in you was men, and that with all love to the coffin?

[CMigyro4hA]

Mist, by the way yes! But what feeling to you is necessary to prove to be with the man before the bed?

[nopoZ]

To … I here not to the time not of , but me they recalled already 3 times. You me so everything do love? =)

[Somfolter]

I zh harmful, and without feelings before the bed do not prove to be. Is wise whether this? knows, in it you will request. But this is MY life, and who will say that I 100% am unjust?
This is normal. It is not mandatory immediately to be fallen in love without the memory, but must be at least hope, which will bear itself -. But to lie down with someone, previously knowing that this down one time - this zh as it is necessary to !
But I here before the childhood read before the clever omasum beyond the sexual theme, that let us allow sex out of the waste with satisfaction of the following conditions (I cite on the memory):
- the achievement by both partners of maturity;
- a good knowledge of each other;
- the firm intention subsequently to enter the waste.
But you speak - there was no sex!

[Somfolter]

matter smells besides the bringing down of surrounding to the bestial condition of the aggressive propaganda of its way of life and the acknowledgment of its point of view as singularly accurate and not subject . for this me seems it lies against the deep realization of a certain fatal error and the desire to drive in this realization beside the depth of its soul by methods known here to all.
And I thus thought. Even it is earlier than in rocker it read.
But yesterday I was in friend, present forum showed it. Including battles and history about .
So it still down me was hooked up, that I, before its opinion, insufficiently condemn! I speak:
- Well I with my women so do not make!
- A, well glory to god!
- I even I am not assembled!
- Well thanks! …
It hardly explained that I not with than…

[SIleM]

b] Of siren, I will not dig forum in search of the proofs of the fact that you precisely these people. Although even the very fact that you speak about the amorality of the personal life Of with the wife, he speaks precisely about this.
And it is correct! You will save time! Row was begun based on the statements Of old Of rocker' and mist, which sharply answered the she-devil. I interceded, indicating the equal laws of participants in the discussion. Word “morals” wrote she-devil (“moral rules”), I only answered.
I did not speak about the amorality Of and its wife. To shovel forum also unwillingness, but could say, that this is unacceptable for me, that this is incompatible for the sake of the love or anything similar. Well so this my opinion and it can be changed as any opinion. Convince! I promise, that to be caught at the point of it from the obstinacy I will not be (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) why the medium of another opinion to immediately become enemy?!





Is morals community - as to live, so as not to fall beside the dissonance with the society, while is morals internal - as to live, so as not to fall beside the dissonance with itself.
But monogamous waste, family, correctness - this of frame external or internal?





I cannot comprehend, on thresh one and the same hundredth time…
You from within, and I outside. To me it is interesting, to you no. Go away, disinterested face! Do not interfere with the interested persons! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)





I am not slotted and am not split,
And to you that I desire,
From the contact with the people
I and to … (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
It is possible to buy bed but not sleep, doctor but not health, sex but not love…

[SIleM]

This “of battle”! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[sAnnjhxx]

This “of battle”! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
… Yes this not only before the battles goes and already long ago…

[SIleM]

Yes this not only before the battles goes and already long ago…
“… it means, this to someone is necessary!”
But if not to you, then always there is the large selection of other themes (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[nopoZ]

How many considerations and morals, about freedom of speech, the faiths also of sex, especially about the freedom of sex. Each makes as it pleases… each it has rights, there as lewd with the skimmings before the angles of mouth it prophesies about the freedom Of , now even it is enraptured and it is ready to follow its example, but and the term cannot in view of . How these two mutants do try to explain that each does have rights on that he does wish, but show me where they they are agreeable that someone does have the rights to condemn them? No… each it has rights, but to condemn their point of view IT IS CANNOT TO ANYONE! If who attempts, then he blunt…
But this is agreeable, and then they do begin to relish their “adventures”, or I not laws? that generally, down entire head, one does also write before 2-3 themes… this from the healthy love or only for the fact that all this did read and all did agree, what it and its wife are fashionable? Yes, they and everything…
I do already look forward posts, each does have right, miller it is necessary to comprehend the strange point of view… people, and you seriously so do think or simply blunt? To take that? Why? The discussion does deal not only about the point of view and not for the sake of its obstinate , simply if I did select the definite line of behavior, and then to avoid conflict it I do reject - this perhaps not ? But why they do not try to comprehend my, for example, point of view? No… if I it is not agreeable, then this from the complexes, from the internal conflicts, not because in me there can be views different from them, no (!), this are all from the complexes!
I can agree that if we you take any point of view - this your nondetachable law, only first think well - and you do wish you to repeat on yourself that the fact that there was with the medium of the taken as far as you point of view… I here I do not wish, that my wife someone , but she did crawl on in search of the new member, no I do not wish… then you will explain, why to me this to assume?
Why if someone does not assume the point of view “of ” (, gays, and so on on the list), then before its (I do not always, it goes without saying, hope you this you realize), then that who does not assume patient, blunt, … and if this itself does not assume the normal point of view, then he simply “stands on his and his this law”. But where my law, to name gay -, but not to correctly homosexuals? Why in me mandatorily “internal conflicts” if I named “freak”, man of that laying my wife under others, and then this relishing before each theme, because he cannot, it should describe although to whom filament, and the beside the sport to hall will not arise.
If you are ready to assume and to understand all , then this especially your problems… I, for example, can live peacefully before the harmony with the peace, without trying to comprehend “freaks” and “mutants”.
And before the conclusion… which means to try to comprehend others, it is possible to try to comprehend peace around you, but not the small group “of ”, if you did not take peace, this ONE, and here if you did not take the point of view of such here types, this already entirely another… and against the level of planetary genius, this is even not dandruff.

[fonAt]

MopoZ, you did replace floor? in my opinion is this not our frost this libel on siberian stag - too not consistently.
Well on the whole you the laws - to assume the point of view foolishly those more if the position of man to you is contrary… It is here contrary? This is a question of questions. You will explain to me entire this paradox - I think all of they here look . Moreover the most different. So why when we do see , us she does excite, and thought to repeat something similar before the real does cause aversion? Can this be not aversion?

[NATELatAL]

So why when we do see , us she does excite, and thought to repeat something similar before the real does cause aversion? Can this be not aversion?
This is fear before the fact that about you they will think (in majority) and to try to seem by correct (before the society).
P.S and I from this am free (from the opinion of the public)





This “of battle”! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
these are , but not battle. Battles - this when they substantiated defend their point of view, completely culturally, also, without .
P.S. try to use your emotions before the real combat - can immediately calculate at the point of the loss

[nopoZ]

MopoZ, you did replace floor? in my opinion is this not our frost this libel on siberian stag - too not consistently.
He wrote before waste… =)





It is here contrary? This is a question of questions.
To me it is disgusting!





You will explain to me entire this paradox - I think all of they here look . Moreover the most different. So why when we do see , us she does excite, and thought to repeat something similar before the real does cause aversion? Can this be not aversion?
I (to , but i have it does not know the word of ) - I do not look gay . Me does not please deep it will pass - when in ram together with the India ink flow tears, salivas, , I I do not look. To me it does not please , I practically do not look them. To me generally deeply to spit who that looks, I look it only the fact that me pleases, for example “mouse rockers based on the masthead”, “chip and deyl”. Yes I generally to barely look, me she now and then amuses more than it excites.





This is fear before the fact that about you they will think (in majority) and to try to seem by correct (before the society).
What fear, to ? Come to… with all down the society and you in particular to spit, everyone thinks that the cleverest and if what they fear, then this is already precise not of society. Yes even as society does learn than you you do occupy? If you, as , will not to all on 3 times tell, on the listening post, ….





They argue culturally with the cultured person, with cultured not culturally. Here to you great truth, …

[Feneboll]

You from within, and I outside. To me it is interesting, to you no. Go away, disinterested face! Do not interfere with the interested persons! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
As you will say, . It went away…

[dhI stutInt]

Morals different occurs. Is morals community - as to live, so as not to fall beside the dissonance with the society, while is morals internal - as to live, so as not to fall beside the dissonance with itself. Community morals - this is those most notorious commandments “not ”, “do not steal” and the like, i.e., all that which prevents other people from living comfortably. Internal morals - this of the frames, established by person himself for itself. But if these internal frames do not go beside the section with the community - before what matter?
You something confuse… the highland sermon of Christ, which contains before itself these of notorious 10 commandments, it is directed not down to the society as a whole, but down to the individual person, in particular. Concepts “not ”, “do not steal” and it is other - they are appeared as once the laws of internal morals, since to society (state), they are hardly acceptable (war, the punishment of criminals, internal conflicts it is other), state and society will not think about the morals, when to it threatens . Person, who kills enemy, no one will condemn at the point of the murder and, first of all, it itself. Another matter, when society and state stimulates our low instincts, pursuing its targets.





Generally, in me impression is created, that , without having attained acknowledgment before other field, decided to attain although thus. But all its conversations about that, for them simply innocent entrainment, and themselves they are super- creative people demonstrative to volume confirmation.
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant





You will explain to me entire this paradox - I think all of they here look . Moreover the most different. So why when we do see , us she does excite, and thought to repeat something similar before the real does cause aversion? Can this be not aversion?
How you do love to speak fanat, “I Che the not ”, you Che not the difference between the image of the individuals and several real of strange peasants which they do furiously separate into fibers beside three holes your to husband, to which you is accurate eight years (on the same words), but you all this do observe, you do expire by deacon by saliva and are afterward joined?
Say to me you this you wish to actually try itself concretely, you and again you…
If wish- that forward to he possibly records you down the reception without the turn… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
Me simply seems that you you for which the not that, and simply you wish to sit down on your dear hobbyhorse of the great debater for the dispute itself, and indeed before principle me seems that you itself not you never down this, also as will not compare cinema about the living corpses with real …
It is possible to buy bed but not sleep, doctor but not health, sex but not love…

[nopoZ]

Generally, in me impression is created, that , without having attained acknowledgment before other field, decided to attain although thus. But all its conversations about that, for them simply innocent entrainment, and themselves they are super- creative people demonstrative to volume confirmation.
But its wife before the interview, openly stated that this is the method to be separated, since before the common gray “office”, down it no one so will turn attention… to simply so, for the sake of mind to be separated not fate, but by if you please.

[NATELatAL]

They argue culturally with the cultured person, with cultured not culturally. Here to you great truth, …
i.e. Moroz, you do consider yourself not cultured?





Generally, in me impression is created, that , without having attained acknowledgment before other field, decided to attain although thus. But all its conversations about that, for them simply innocent entrainment, and themselves they are super- creative people demonstrative to volume confirmation.
on me, so you greatly make mistakes)

[nopoZ]

i.e. Moroz, you do consider yourself not cultured?
Cultured, when I argue with the cultured people, even dear and thoughtful… and when is here with , then no.





on me, so you greatly make mistakes)
About it is in my opinion very even correct…

[NATELatAL]

MopoZ, but than on your of did show itself as not cultured?

[nopoZ]

MopoZ, but than on your of did show itself as not cultured?
It is ridiculous…
A question to the lewd, although, if who wishes to answer, if you please.
So here, a question to the comrade lewd as to the principal fan and the adorer Of (about the solidarity and only- that to write is not necessary, solidarity - this one, but when people cry down the floor of theme, if “to the enemy” of their “idol” they placed + before the reputation - this entirely another). So here, strictly a question.
If , this fine person is simply accurate to his traditions (group sex), then down , he does create piles, thereby, moreover are directed they only down to of his, wife and their , why he with the rapture on 3-4 times does write one and also (where it will go and as they will there ? Perhaps one time it is not sufficient? Or it so is disturbed, which someone can not read about their and that down the given moment its wife cannot reduce strut? This all, to me is here interesting to what.
Wife beside the souls, it runs down the forum it will impart that they will go to , wife to sleep, it again down the forum, to describe that it they crashed. It, which thinks that here all live and wait report about its “adventures” (before 3 copies), or it he thinks, who it lives as far as the common normal (!) by life, it is so dull that they do dream to read a little and to envy to its ? Personally I, after sex, already will forgive, about the forum I think least of all… and somehow it does not come to run foaming at the mouth and to entire light, on the listening post, to describe beside the head. Although, I can to assume that my sex with my girl, it is considerably more interesting, and it is more sensory than Of , I do not write about this. It is agreeable, is agreeable, forum for this and necessary, but a question does remain, why as many to write!? Why everything before three copies, why so many that? It which the glory does wish? Strictly here…

[dhI stutInt]

on me, so you greatly make mistakes)
In any way, I do not make mistakes… itself it gave to comprehend that of predilection its its their its wife- this principal achievement. No one pulled it at the point of the language, it itself described about the transfer before TNT, this then, already he said that he writes music, but its wife of … it still and (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
It could before other themes, not connected directly for the sake of the sex describe about its creativity, give reference down its music and was other however, not this for it main thing. But its conversations about the fact that it arrived precisely down the sex forum, nothing else but a good mine with the poor play… the attempt to say that not down uniform is limited its peace… is not rolled… it even from the history of other Rome, it gave out the reference, where it is told about the orgies, although it claimed down the knowledge of Roman history, about than and it directly said to the same to Moroz.
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant

[fonAt]

But generally for me this something is greater than simply . Besides other things, this is a certain freedom before relations. In my view relations before the family must be constructed on by something higher than sex. And generally the alliance of man and woman this of its type tool making it possible to satisfy man of his requirement - people generally are joined in order to solve some problems, otherwise alliances are not viable on no matter by what they they were not constructed.
Before the family we satisfy the requirement at the point of the contact with the person close to you before the spirit, the requirement at the point of the continuation of type, the requirement at the point of the self-actualization before the society, the requirement at the point of the material goods and much other. The discussion deals for the sake of such things before achievement of which often you by no means each it can help, and only that coma you entrust. Each separately these requirements are insignificant. But before the aggregate they give serious occasion in order to bring family - to conclude alliance with someone for long years. And before this alliance people must be:
a. of ;
b. are attentive to the husband;
I continue to claim that to be physically true to one person entire life… it is unreally complicated - this is small coma under the force. But it means necessary to be more flexibly. Finally - if they changed you above the back - you is cuckold, if in you on the eyes - you is simply eccentric person. What of this worse? the first, because family, and this as I already said above alliance of two people - can be constructed only with the condition that you each other you entrust!

[NATELatAL]

MopoZ, each of us does write that, about which he does wish to write, I you did request where the lack of culture?
well and apropos fanaticism - you did not guess, yes even cried here no one except you like.

[NATELatAL]

what difference to me to Rome or still to what first, I by the way also play, also creative person, and our music earlier was aggressive to the age of those days, it then became vital what that with the hues, when they began to , and proved to be effect beyond the music sexual experiences for the most part, in spite of subjects))





I even concept do not have that this such

[nopoZ]

It is shorter, the principal lick-spittle Of - lewd could not answer a specific question (as his idol, not capable of answering the concrete questions, if they do not concern their ), but also refute also it could not…

[NATELatAL]

MopoZ, so it is possible to learn where I could not answer what that question?
and where the lack of culture was revealed?

[NATELatAL]

and to what this ? this is interesting here to whom that? to me no.
.. the culture of the concentration camps of Poland () for me discovery I will say honestly.
But if we already then speak, then culture exists everywhere and any, but to whom first it is interesting, to whom that no, only some of Moroz's type behave as stocks old on the market, they gossip, as this is bad (if by them this is incomprehensible)

[nopoZ]

A question to the lewd, although, if who wishes to answer, if you please.
So here, a question to the comrade lewd as to the principal fan and the adorer Of (about the solidarity and only- that to write is not necessary, solidarity - this one, but when people cry down the floor of theme, if “to the enemy” of their “idol” they placed + before the reputation - this entirely another). So here, strictly a question.
If , this fine person is simply accurate to his traditions (group sex), then down , he does create piles, thereby, moreover are directed they only down to of his, wife and their , why he with the rapture on 3-4 times does write one and also (where it will go and as they will there ? Perhaps one time it is not sufficient? Or it so is disturbed, which someone can not read about their and that down the given moment its wife cannot reduce strut? This all, to me is here interesting to what.
Wife beside the souls, it runs down the forum it will impart that they will go to , wife to sleep, it again down the forum, to describe that it they crashed. It, which thinks that here all live and wait report about its “adventures” (before 3 copies), or it he thinks, who it lives as far as the common normal (!) by life, it is so dull that they do dream to read a little and to envy to its ? Personally I, after sex, already will forgive, about the forum I think least of all… and somehow it does not come to run foaming at the mouth and to entire light, on the listening post, to describe beside the head. Although, I can to assume that my sex with my girl, it is considerably more interesting, and it is more sensory than Of , I do not write about this. It is agreeable, is agreeable, forum for this and necessary, but a question does remain, why as many to write!? Why everything before three copies, why so many that? It which the glory does wish? Strictly here…





and to what this ? this is interesting here to whom that? to me no.
Yes to you is generally interesting current Of =)