Pascal vs all disagreeing.:)

[Bsgn]

Let us be to argue in place specially reserved for this. In this case me interests process itself, but not result.
Theme is such:
Why you do count that I I do not know how to agree, to be apologized, to recognize your errors and so forth?
I this theme generally speaking created in order with all to reconcile. It is sometimes me greatly desirable to hammer , Moroz and even . But I understand that this because of the lack of understanding of each other. I would wish here it was obtained that me it would not be desirable with you to be scolded down any your saying. Indeed we all here - friends. I many years was ago on our local forum and there we everything were very friendly in spite of our disagreements. And because of the fact that we were of one city we they were assembled once they per month and associated simply since good friends. I would wish to find here tighter the atmosphere of kindness that also beyond that forum.

[nopoZ]

Psgl, you would create theme that to reconcile, thus? But result itself does not interest you, thus reconciliation for you becomes before this theme not result, but so by-product, can yes, can no)
Where these attempts, where the step down to the reconciliation? I to reconcile itself neither with whom wish, because nor it did not litter itself with whom. But you, here decided to be reconciled, well reveal initiative. But based on your side I see only recurrent theme “and try once more me to reconvince”. And as noted respected jhonysilver, for the beginning create for the theme the appropriate name. VS, does already indicate that you against all remaining, where zh this your desire to be reconciled? How it, that the result to you is not important!





It is sometimes me greatly desirable to hammer , Moroz and even .
Whom strange =)





But I understand that this because of the lack of understanding of each other.
Nothing you understand… here I you I not at all understand, I consider your words, KKhM… not entirely accurate, but to hammer you, to burn your apartment, to break down to you struts, to sell you beside the servitude, it does not wish me. To me this even somehow beside the head did not come, I clearly understand, this is dispute on the spaces OF VIRTUAL net. So that the desire to hammer “, Moroz and even ”, this not from the lack of understanding of each other, but personally because of you. You wish… you greatly you wish to be right, and they here you tell that not laws and in view of their possibilities they prove this. Here you wish to hammer.





Indeed we all here - friends. I many years was ago on our local forum and there we everything were very friendly in spite of our disagreements.
But here not thus? To to hammer us wish exclusively YOU! No one of us thought down the traumatization of your small carcass. NO ONE!!! Only you expressed the desire to beat us and even woman! Thousands of ! Rascal! =)





I would wish to find here tighter the atmosphere of kindness that also beyond that forum.
Discontinue, for the beginning to wish “to hammer , Moroz and even . ”! =)
Z. y. I generally, you will wish to hammer us, we will be gathered together, you will shoot down based on the struts, and we with will break down to you member! =))

[Bsgn]

you and simpletons. I joke before the name of theme concluded. And all emergent impressions from the name must were they from its content. But you again cavil to the words. is some.
Me is sometimes desirable you to hammer NOT because in you opinion another. Me terrifically enrages precisely the fact that you do not understand obvious things. Any normal person had to comprehend before what here plug. I named theme before the genre of opposition simply in order to correspond to the genre of section before which we we are located. But you could not comprehend even this. Here already will excuse not I fool (and to me that you will say that you you think otherwise). In this case let although entire forum will say that I it created theme I I will count that entire forum of blunt. Because to any five-KLAdreamku say first that I I speak first about (in this case I show that this to speak not seriously with the help of ) and then already seriously that in reality I wish to reconcile. So here he precisely me will comprehend. . I beside the dust to you everything chew and you all you complain me. .
Even desire vanished with you to be reconciled. Idiots, . Well perhaps this is normal? I wished to joke. I wished you to me to be written that I it would decide to put right with all of relation and you instead of this me you attack again.
! …

[nopoZ]

Psgl, “all blunt, one I clever”.
All your beautiful words, all your smiles and dear twitchings century… mask. As said Ilya , anger is always sincere, what cannot be said about laughter. Here you showed your …





I decided to put right with all of relation
After you named all idiots, this will become still =))

[Af dhI feef]

you and simpletons. I joke before the name of theme concluded. And all emergent impressions from the name must were they from its content. But you again cavil to the words. is some.
Me is sometimes desirable you to hammer NOT because in you opinion another. Me terrifically enrages precisely the fact that you do not understand obvious things. Any normal person had to comprehend before what here plug. I named theme before the genre of opposition simply in order to correspond to the genre of section before which we we are located. But you could not comprehend even this. Here already will excuse not I fool (and to me that you will say that you you think otherwise). In this case let although entire forum will say that I it created theme I I will count that entire forum of blunt. Because to any five-KLAdreamku say first that I I speak first about (in this case I show that this to speak not seriously with the help of ) and then already seriously that in reality I wish to reconcile. So here he precisely me will comprehend. . I beside the dust to you everything chew and you all you complain me. .
Even desire vanished with you to be reconciled. Idiots, . Well perhaps this is normal? I wished to joke. I wished you to me to be written that I it would decide to put right with all of relation and you instead of this me you attack again.
! …
Psgl, as all intricately… you first itself be dismantled that to you necessarily and that you generally wish to bring to us, to the idiots…

[TwInly]

, gaily, however, here in you)

[Af dhI feef]

, perhaps this is gay? To here cry in time… Man strangely absorbs reality and it reacts down the criticism. This is ridiculous?

[TwInly]

you understand, it is necessary to cry, but it is nevertheless ridiculous. such people fasten me. which think that they the cleverest, and in reality -… it indicate here that it interests the process of dispute, but not result, before another theme- that he does not argue for the dispute. he indicates that for the discovery of the business it is must of 200 pieces, and he does not understand, why this is ridiculous…
yes even if with the help of it is possible to delight in by muff, why it cannot be “distinct speech”?
to , (or as them there, it could be mistaken), the witnesses of , - and other sectarians I nick already only laughter and is caused… and another pity

[Bsgn]

, to you is complicated to speak.
Time does not stand on the spot. It did not the fact that come out once in someone can it will come out in friend now. Recall the peace of 20 years ago and compare it with the present. What it was possible to do then? But that now? Then we with you could not so associate as now. Now it is possible to translate peace based on the struts to the head in the week. I do not assume the position of friend. I am not simply agreeable with the position Of .
of thanks! Is good evil. It is kind - these are the correct work of system, and the evil - failure.
You do wish so that all Russian people they would live well? I also wish this, but I comprehended that to do this unreally difficultly. Not before my forces to influence or . They will be live since they they wish. In this case for them strange opinion this is also the very that also “delirium and obscurantism”. They do not assume that truth it can be different. But they are not exclusions. In each, who has the brains there is his opinion and his target before the life. To change their behavior by the draft “give to live harmoniously” impossibly (although it can in you it will come out. I is more not to camp to try).
You do wish to save Russia? I also this wish. But I comprehended that this impossibly. The fact that now it occurs in Russia - this the plan of the USA is after the Second World War. Before it that the values will be substituted. People will forget about the honest life. They themselves will annihilate. I.e. WE ourselves will annihilate. And this occurs. I am astonished as Russia still it lives. Young people become an alcoholic. For them there is nothing important besides as to get drunk and to smoke. Around stalls before which it is sold thousands of varieties of beer and cigarette. And it can be other squids dried. It is certainly painful to look against this, but people themselves selected this life. They gripped that bait which to them they gave and now before the ear. Why I do not drink and do not smoke? Because I selected another life. I wish to live well.
Earlier, I as you tried to influence those surrounding so that they they would correspond to me. In me little which came out. People did not listen to me. They spoke that they live well and more by them nothing it is necessary. They resigned themselves down death beside 40 years from or infarction. They resigned themselves down the constant misfortune. let. Now I was aimed against the search of the already determined people. Now me encircle people those understanding that with them they try to do. But they before majority their good, tons to clever villains are very small. If man has the brains that he most likely good. Thus I gather around itself clever people. Is received the city of the sun before which there are no violence and misfortunes. And this is not utopia. I do not change people around itself I I pass them through the filter. Let the pigs continue to rot overindulging to the imps. I selected another life. And you I advise rather to comprehend that struggle with the evil it gives birth to also evil itself. Necessarily simply it will be protected from it. At the worst which us does prevent from leaving from the country?
Some attempts of the government of the country to put right situation are certainly now noticeable. I hope that Russia it . But itself I that regardless of the fact that will be confident with Russia in me everything will be good.
The city of the sun this is not utopia.
Utopia this that entire Russia will be able to live before this harmony. Although there can be when people and they will comprehend that kindness considerably more pleasant than malice and they . But as said , we this will not see.

[Bsgn]

Pascal… you as always :. but here this of the gold reserves!!!! that is named… and my city then generally… “NAME TO HIM LEGION” (s.)….the dark will arrive based on the black sea ")) …. (a little… that… paraphrased) "….") "
The fact that my thoughts are similar down the strangers it does not mean that I them it stole in someone. This is only your assumption.
But latter phrase I did not comprehend.
of sh@rip , commonly known you do speak? To me is not ridiculous.
I sent you not down , namely down . Then I also apologized herself, tons to this behavior to me not is characteristic.
But apropos defects. I give to very much attention. You do wish with this to argue? Strange defects do not disturb practically me. I said that I do not try to more correct people. Live as you consider it necessary, but the admonition apropos of small jokes I will repeat again, if you rough groundless.

[CMigyro4hA]

Latter posts hence. Those desiring again to take away in the child of - can continue entertainments.

[TwInly]

Small , it is possible?
Pascal, you there do not look, I as you, young people, current I for some reason see that the majority stick smoking and by alcohol… stalls carry….evil and clever , mind and evil- good - independent besides each other concepts…
Although it is glad at the point of you, that you found your circle of contact, normal people, Pascal, if some pigs earlier fell, then it is good that with them you do not associate, apparently, actually it began to be disassembled.

[Bsgn]

Of twilly , possibly and not there. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
Although I also see that people they throw to smoke and to drink. But judging as far as the growth (but it there is) of the drunk alcohol down one person per year (on the beer first is already is precisely noticeable growth by steps) not very that believes that as a result all they will become teetotallers.
I am very glad at the point of you, Besides . I spoke that we themselves we make the peace surrounding us. And if you positive it only means you itself very positive person. This is wonderful.
Positive also encircles me, but I somewhat am interested before matters before the city, the country and the peace. The fact that in me from the friends already almost no one smokes nor drinks it does not indicate that the entire world it began to be improved.
I talked for the sake of the guard before one . He to me described how much beer it is bought only in their magazine within one night. By boxes they purchase. Or simply when I to the ides along the street see as 5 they stand by small circle and before the center of their circle it costs 6 bottles of beer on 1,5 liters. I another attention down the fact that when I went before Peter before our car it stood terrible it smelled and dried fish. This of they went together with us. I do not condemn them. I simply do not wish to be similar.
Apropos good and mind. Killer and opressor or robber - is more frequently fool than by genius. With this in no way you argue in my opinion.

[nopoZ]

But than you are worse than ostriches?! Yes by in no way!!!
Well yes… and astronomer - also identical professions. Principle is one - beside the hole to look…





Killer
But perhaps among the killers it does not occur the professionals of its matter?





the robber -
Robin Of =))) ") ")





Now it is possible to translate peace based on the struts to the head in the week.
Couple I do not see not what strong changes in the last 20 years. Everything goes by even running. There are no rolls of peace…
But you recall at the point of example 2 world… as one person it turned over peace… and this was far beyond 20 years of =)

[Bsgn]

Shiraq of May is ”…. Or Kam's Back…. And I do look with the new forces and the new ideas… you where them it did scoop? …
Time does not stand on the spot….
I think in you with the friend similar diagnoses before ambulatory *…
Recall the peace of 20 years ago and compare it with the present
and I do not intend on my strong to protuberance it draws dozens of … to reject to itself and my children before the favor besides such here “thinkers”….
I am not simply agreeable with the position Of .
To of ..... to weeping…
Not before my forces to influence or . They will be live since they they wish. In this case for them strange opinion this is also the very that also “delirium and obscurantism”. They do not assume that truth it can be different. But they are not exclusions.
note… neither I nor Mister nor mega-Tsatsa Moroz by fronts do not encounter… as you this can explain, in order not to do harm to its conceit?
In each, who has the brains there is his opinion and his target before the life. To change their behavior by the draft “give to live harmoniously” impossibly (although it can in you it will come out. I is more not to camp to try).
Strong - lone person…
- before the mass…
You do wish to save Russia? I also this wish.
Cerebral parasites make after all their dark deed:. of.…. Suddenly this is infectious….
Strange defects do not disturb practically me. I said that I do not try to more correct people. Live as you consider it necessary, but the admonition apropos of small jokes I will repeat again, if you rough groundless.
But it is interesting, why you do intend to admonish to Mister ??? … A??? … down the charging that at the point of recurrent…
PS pascal… you itself said that all your friends you hated (even before the theme of )… well… I them would completely understand… if was not such philanthropic philanthropist… based on you to me simply ridiculously…
Before its head of . It did think, and why this I before you am crucified? What to me matter to the people me not understanding? None. Output asserts itself by itself - receive pleasure based on the contact, but if you do not receive it that do not associate. This means that everything that I will write I will write for the entertainment. By the way, I write always truth. T to lie does not deliver to me pleasure. Therefore all who laughed apropos 250 thousand rubles they can be assured before the fact that I he spoke truth. Well why to me to lie? This is not interesting and it is unpleasant.
Yes, we both are healthy.
I also intend to draw no one on itself. Therefore was not supported friend. You be more attentively. I indeed this already spoke.
Do not cry, dear, when you say that with which I will be agreeable I you I will immediately support. You will now want never to answer that will not have the general opinion with the mad . Then can continue to cry. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) written is humor.





It is agreeable with you. before the mass - this of sheep or rams. But also tigers live together. But you did not know? I do not remember as precisely it is named their collective, like . It is analogous and in the world people. I try to attract to itself or to be introduced to strong people. But sheep let are grazed. Already excuse, to introduce itself to the herd of rams in me language will not be turned. This indeed will be untruth.
This you gaily joked about the parasites. I indeed have the right to wish to help Russia to be raised based on the elbows. But I also further wrote that this is impossible for me now. The question is settled? If no, read again post from where you it copied the fact that it wrote.
Admonitions and to you and to any other I will make always, in such a case if , you, or any other person will groundless try to offend another person. I know that , you, or any other person most likely will not be changed if I I make to it this admonition, but that person which was offended it will feel alleviation, tons to will not feel itself lonely. Recall when you to me was placed before the philosophical theme. And recall that I then there it wrote. I hope you me it comprehended now. If no, then re-read again philosophical theme about the orthographical errors.
With what target you did write PS? In order to offend me. But you do remember that before this theme itself you wrote that no one of it is scolded with me. it does not try to insult me or to humble. You said that you are simply disagreeing with my opinion.
So say to me, , forum is friendly? Namely, is friendly you with respect to me? Is friendly Moroz? or ?
And do not tell me that I myself before this it is guilty. Was begun everything for the sake of long ago even before the theme . This forum does not have that atmosphere which was on that old forum. There are here people, which are actually friendly, and with them I not to camp to be scolded never. And they also do not have reasons to write the fact that I I speak delirium.
I will be repeated. If you are not agreeable with whose or position, this does not give to you the law to claim that it mad. This does not give the law “to wash” it. You can express your opinion. But to the medium of another opinion this is foolish. To . If you do try me to learn (as you themselves did speak), do try me to reconvince so that I it would begin to live “correctly”, then think, what advice I will listen to attentively? That before which me is named mad or that where to me without the emotional paint they why my thought it is inaccurate. Therefore your reaction down my posts and now and down the posts of the friend of , since you spoke beside the vacuum. One word “washed” before the statement it completely killed the meaning of its statement. Perhaps you this do not understand?
Sadly that I yielded to your pressure it in the past and became similar to you after answering the offenses by very.





I spoke that we themselves we make the peace surrounding us. And if you positive it only means you itself very positive person. ….Positive also encircles me, but I somewhat am interested before matters before the city, the country and the peace. The fact that in me from the friends already almost no one smokes nor drinks it does not indicate that the entire world it began to be improved.
And again contradiction on the complete….
How you as a whole did influence the people before this peace???
How you did do better your surrounding peace??? (and that it means MY SURROUNDING Mir - this is autism????)
You simply bounded your contact by the same “good” as you… not and what is more…
The relationship of good and evil in the world your selection in no way did influence… you, that this you do not realize itself? …
If you took inveterate killers, opressors and druggies under your wing and he molded of them the considerable members of society - then YES…. But so your statement loud about its abilities to change peace, is not more than the methods of autotraining…
And…
It is important
Nondrinker- that not smoking - does not mean GOOD!!!
I here thus far still not whom sent:. and men does not as long as pass the face of decent contact, I am always correct… I even you it did not send:. note… although you completely this it deserved…
And all your convulsive assurances about the love at the point of the people the pitiful attempt to deserve in the universe down 10 pieces of Baxes… this is I to that your assurances NOT OF THE SOUL, but of the self-interest, because you did read before the omasum, which SO IS MUST… and must again after all for which??? … based on the same explanations, so that “the money from the strange pockets would flow beside your” (you I do cite word-for-word)… you itself for yourself cannot determine that it does mean to make peace better… to pump out from good and good ? … or to associate with nondrinker- those not smoking? … that it is so restricted that I indicate the parameters “good people” were indicated their only external manifestations “to ”… not and what is more… that it will in no way prevent Tim people as however and to you, to behave about caddish and … and already as far as the fact the more mean by low-…

[TwInly]

Pascal, a question down the charging, and you why did return? In order to say that not understand- not love- do offend?

[Bsgn]

But perhaps among the killers it does not occur the professionals of its matter?





the robber -
Robin Of =))) ") ")





Now it is possible to translate peace based on the struts to the head in the week.
Couple I do not see not what strong changes in the last 20 years. Everything goes by even running. There are no rolls of peace…
But you recall at the point of example 2 world… as one person it turned over peace… and this was far beyond 20 years of =)
You indeed is agreeable with me, Moroz. Why you do argue? I did not say that it clever robbers and robbers. I said that their large part - foolish people. Take juvenile offenders' camp for example and look how many there clever people, and how many blunt . Explosion will be very great.
How this you do not see changes in 20 years? USSR- Russia. But when ruble did fall that was? But they are not before this. I when this spoke, bore in mind that which now is considerably more than the possibilities in people of those being trying to change the life of the country.
Here recently film moved out - tough nut 4. bright illustration of my words. Already 20 years ago about similar and could not be thought. But in 20 more years from the present day similar problems will become reality, also, for us.

[Bsgn]

I spoke that we themselves we make the peace surrounding us. And if you positive it only means you itself very positive person. ….Positive also encircles me, but I somewhat am interested before matters before the city, the country and the peace. The fact that in me from the friends already almost no one smokes nor drinks it does not indicate that the entire world it began to be improved.
And again contradiction on the complete….
How you as a whole did influence the people before this peace???
How you did do better your surrounding peace??? (and that it means MY SURROUNDING Mir - this is autism????)
You simply bounded your contact by the same “good” as you… not and what is more…
The relationship of good and evil in the world your selection in no way did influence… you, that this you do not realize itself? …
If you took inveterate killers, opressors and druggies under your wing and he molded of them the considerable members of society - then YES…. But so your statement loud about its abilities to change peace, is not more than the methods of autotraining…
And…
It is important
Nondrinker- that not smoking - does not mean GOOD!!!
I here thus far still not whom sent:. and men does not as long as pass the face of decent contact, I am always correct… I even you it did not send:. note… although you completely this it deserved…
And all your convulsive assurances about the love at the point of the people the pitiful attempt to deserve in the universe down 10 pieces of Baxes… this is I to that your assurances NOT OF THE SOUL, but of the self-interest, because you did read before the omasum, which SO IS MUST… and must again after all for which??? … based on the same explanations, so that “the money from the strange pockets would flow beside your” (you I do cite word-for-word)… you itself for yourself cannot determine that it does mean to make peace better… to pump out from good and good ? … or to associate with nondrinker- those not smoking? … that it is so restricted that I indicate the parameters “good people” were indicated their only external manifestations “to ”… not and what is more… that it will in no way prevent Tim people as however and to you, to behave about caddish and … and already as far as the fact the more mean by low-…
You contradiction besides my words in order to accuse me before madness? . Well the fact that you wrote it is not . Give my dialog with the friend. I today exactly wrote about the fact that I do not influence the balance of good and evil. I influence of good and evil around itself.
How this does occur? It is very simple. Earlier me encircled down the greater degree weak people. Now I to only with the strong (clever) people. And now before my encirclement “it is incomprehensible from where” (incomprehensibly from where for you, I that know that I with of it attracted to itself such people. Recall film listening post. There also it is discussed the law of attraction) they undertook and businessmen, simply rich and successful people, brilliant people and those who forewent the material goods in favor of sincere development. They all strong. There is among them and those who drink and those who they smoke. But not before this essence. Essence before the fact that they live in the manner that they they wish. They are clever. And in me does not appear the desires to teach this person about the fact that smoking detrimentally. I understand that this person it smokes deliberately. I learn in such people.





My statements are not completely loud. I simply speak the fact that to eat. I wanted peace around itself to change (I wished the peace to be good and , I wished me to be loved the people so that me they would respect they would value, I he wished to also improve its financial position) and as a result I all this receive.
You speak that I this it attained with of autotraining. But , how by such I do suddenly become acquainted with the strong people? I accidentally become acquainted. But why precisely then when I the beginnings of by this beginning to occur? Here is this already contradiction before your words, .
But to to the drinking and smoking people. Remind me if you please Of , such as percentage of all in Russia is completed before the condition of alcoholic . A good person after getting drunk can such do that then itself will at the point of this entire life. Therefore I count that love at the point of alcohol - indirect to man.
Money always go from whose that of pockets. Be it good person or evil, the main thing so that beside my pocket would flow.
I am mercenary. I wish. I wish to live since I I wish. Perhaps this is bad?

[Bsgn]

I returned in order to receive pleasure based on the contact with the interesting people.
Pravda this is complicated, when me name mad or advance theories nothing my general with reality apropos return. Moreover with the target me to tease or to humble.
To me only one is offensive. I to one, and man understands another. Moreover if there are people which are understood me correctly, means problem that not before me, but as a result I nevertheless prove to be by fool.
Theme Pascal against all disagreeing I hope soon will be closed. Moderators, do this if you please.
I wish to receive pleasure based on the contact. But to be repeated on 10 times in order to din into its position does not deliver to me pleasure. Surely it is worthwhile to ignore the statements Of , and Moroz.

[SIleM]

… and here the rams (not understandably only why) live gregarious….

[nopoZ]

You indeed is agreeable with me, Moroz. Why you do argue?
In order to you me by the ostrich not of =)





How this you do not see changes in 20 years? USSR- Russia. But when ruble did fall that was? But they are not before this.
Final that is not the question… to the collapse of the USSR this is the long cumbersome work of whole states. And such is received to crank very rarely and not each… or you will say, this can be done very?





I when this spoke, bore in mind that which now is considerably more than the possibilities in people of those being trying to change the life of the country.
The possibilities to eat were and it will be…
Here only far from each national generally understands - that it is necessary to make.
Among those understanding - far from each wishes this to make.





As before any other matter.
So that I do not see that it was changed… you wish something to change, learn, climb through beside the system, be disassembled as it is there tripled and that it is necessary to make.





Here recently film moved out - tough nut 4. bright illustration of my words.
Recently moved out still “predator against the stranger: requiem”, the bright illustration of my nightmares…





Here recently film moved out - tough nut 4. bright illustration of my words. Already 20 years ago about similar and could not be thought. But in 20 more years from the present day similar problems will become reality, also, for us.
What such problems of tough nut you do harass? Computer collapse? Or Bruce 's baldness? If we do not drink vitamins, then this problem can touch you and it is earlier. Or the problem of the fact that the daughter of of father does send? Well, also it can be, if you to children will read beyond the night. If you about the idea of film, then you an even greater child than seem… this fantasy, fiction, delirium…

[SIleM]

If I evil, then evil people are pulled to me, if I good, then I see kindness after the response. And this works. When I was angered down this peace it was angered down me after the response. Specifically, then people hated me. Therefore then I hated peace. Now I changed my relation to the peace. I see his beauty and I for the most part cover eyes down the negative. Is received that I I attract kindness and success. What we have now. Before my encirclement appeared the people, which are very good to me. And this completely not randomness. Down the activity I obtained response reaction.
Nothing I know about and I do not wish to know, but it is forced to agree with you, Pascal. It seems that so there is. I, true, such global and goal-directed manipulations with my individual did not complete, but a confirmation by your to maxims I have. For example, our juvenile district doctor me it always greatly pleased, and it was, it is in turn with me always benevolent and it was professional. But friend my, living before the same area and attending the same doctor with her son, suffer it could not, it considered it near, incompetent and the rest never to me they behaved boorishly in all possible registries and other office places, but I know people, which cannot the work reach in order not to with someone.
And still I will add the opinion of professional: the familiar psychologist, to whom I somehow complained herself, that down me “will fall” the men near, but brutal (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_), he said “incorrectly you flirt. It means, you stick out sexuality, but you hide individual. On what you catch, then ”. How it strongly me puzzled then.





I to one, and man understands another. Moreover if there are people which are understood me correctly, means problem that not before me, but as a result I nevertheless prove to be by fool.
- the second sensible thought in the days. You get better. By the way you did not think… can “before the conservatory something not thus?”





Surely it is worthwhile to ignore the statements Of , and Moroz.
- begin directly now… Still can throw out computer beside the port, nevertheless write without the errors in you well in no way it is received - to so that but torture itself and electricity in vain spend? You will earn on the homemade plastic ports, will buy to itself and will fly away there, where I am not… and there will be to you nirvana. Amen!!!





I returned in order to receive pleasure based on the contact with the interesting people. Pravda this is complicated…
- in your case it is logical. Third plus in the day.





when me name mad or advance theories nothing my general with reality apropos return.
- faster thought was following: “… when me name mad or advance theories having nothing my general with the reason return (down the forum - the note of interpreter)…” - Again laws, scoundrel…
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[nopoZ]

Is further so, the small separation of flights.





In you opinion not contradictory each other because you identical. In me another view which at the point of you in no way succeeds to comprehend either you can they comprehended but you do not wish before this to believe or it can you they comprehended but you do not wish to be changed or by .........
Or, your view is not so plausible, so justified, so naive and it is not reinforced by the facts that to write against - =) this it would be life situation, we, they most likely listened to 2 minutes and from you, giggling and considering you, but these are forum… entirely another matter. We here and write here.





Admonitions and to you and to any other I will make always, in such a case if , you, or any other person will groundless try to offend another person. I know that , you, or any other person most likely will not be changed if I I make to it this admonition, but that person which was offended it will feel alleviation, tons to will not feel itself lonely.
You have megalomania? You do actually consider yourself after god or saint or clarified? I to joked about this) ")
You do not understand and do not see simple things… if you to me you say that I not laws, I first will laugh, will then write “…” and this even “bunches” will not be, not the fact that there insulted will feel the flood tide of light. If to me says this , well, … of something will be changed, although “…” I will not write to it. If says -, I will be I will hesitate in thought. Everything is simple…





Is friendly Moroz?
Not it is not coldly hot… in parallel. You did not engage for the sake of nothing… I write only because there is that to write and you you try (!) to answer, only- that.





How this does occur? It is very simple. Earlier me encircled down the greater degree weak people. Now I to only with the strong (clever) people. And now before my encirclement “it is incomprehensible from where” (incomprehensibly from where for you, I that know that I with of it attracted to itself such people. Recall film listening post. There also it is discussed the law of attraction) they undertook and businessmen, simply rich and successful people, brilliant people and those who forewent the material goods in favor of sincere development.
You entered the sect! =))) ") "





I learn in such people.
thus far is received… speech not rehearsed, is many evident contradictions, nerve, it is inclined down the interruptions, it is not communicative, it terribly knows even foundations of sciences (of type of history, biology, philosophy). So what you do learn? =)))





If I evil, then evil people are pulled to me, if I good, then I see kindness after the response.
But here this is strange… why such clever people as MopoZ, , with you do argue? ") "))

[Bsgn]

I to on the white wrote that I when I admonish I I try to influence not it, I wish so that the person it would not feel itself guilty. For example when you me were attacked increasingly with the reproaches about the orthographical errors I it felt yourselves guilty, although in reality this exceptionally my matter as to write. And you not before the law me to judge. But at the point of me entered I it was weakened, tons to the guilty itself, because of it, now did not feel. Moreover here megalomania?
Now I begin. Those statements Of , and Moroz which will be connected for the sake of the discussion me, will be ignored. I this did not wish, but that it is possible to still do?
Of siren , I give you I will kiss. Pleasant to read posts where with me they agree.
Before the plan of relations for the sake of the people “the repulsing” is met . People conduct you with you in the manner that you you behave with them. I for example answered as far as negative the negative of very recently, to what itself greatly astonished.
You very correctly noticed about the opinion of psychologist. It accurate down all one hundred conceals a deep philosophy. We are the creators of our peace, but as long as we will not take before the hands necessary tool we we will not obtain based on the peace of that what we wish (in order to cut on the tree it is necessary hammer and special chisel, but before the work with the peace to you are necessary virtual tools - knowledge. If you know as to give yourself down man, then you will obtain that what you you wish. If you do not know, then you will obtain near). You wished before you to be seen the individual, but she conducted, and it thought of the main thing erroneously (thought they play very important role before our life, indeed before each activity first we we think). They after to you said that problem it was concealed before you, you comprehended that necessarily otherwise yourself news, but the main thing - you began to otherwise think of. Before your hands the tool appeared and I think that after that conversation situation it was changed down the best side. Or not?
It is possible much to write on this. Principal that - this is universal tool. You can seek response down each question of . For example you learned before what the reason for your to with the peasants. But you cannot apply this practice in other case. But all against a deeper level. And you can apply it both against the personal front and on the work, before any vital question. After reading it you you will comprehend as it is possible to solve any problem arisen on your route, you also will comprehend why it arose. And even it is more! You will be able to do so that the problems would envelop you by side, and success accompanied you always. It does not believe? Well I indeed was laws about the fact that you you receive only the fact that you give, it means also before this I can be laws. I advise you to read a little . Then if I is pleased I advise to you still many interesting books - tools.

[nopoZ]

I to on the white wrote that I when I admonish I I try to influence not it, I wish so that the person it would not feel itself guilty.
You they did comprehend and from the very first… well and about what principle, you will decide who guilty, but who no?





For example when you me were attacked increasingly with the reproaches about the orthographical errors I it felt yourselves guilty, although in reality this exceptionally my matter as to write.
Dana? This is your service record, until you enter beside the conversation. You know, man in which problem with the prostate - this is final its matter, but when it leads girl down itself home, strips it, excites, and then he speaks, excuse in me it does not stand and not serpent me before this to reproach - matter other.





And you not before the law me to judge.
We are not right to judge, if this us does not concern… and when you you write us, then has the complete law to write!





But at the point of me entered I it was weakened, tons to the guilty itself, because of it, now did not feel.
They were sorry you, and you are glad…





Now I begin. Those statements Of , and Moroz which will be connected for the sake of the discussion me, will be ignored. I this did not wish, but that it is possible to still do?
But about which for the sake of you then to talk? ")) You not before one are not able to reason sufficiently in order with you news conversation… so about which to you to speak? On the plastic ports? =))





Listen to, solid of today… had long ago been so not cheered itself… let he writes still…
Entire was finished… pascal placed merciless term, or it to praise or positive will not be.
. . plastic ports there will be no longer such ridiculous…

[Af dhI feef]

First about the pleasant: jhonysilver, sh@rip, MopoZ, with all on “plus” at the point of the fact that you spend your precious forces and time beyond the contact with the blunt-nose!
Now about the fact that it read.





I to on the white wrote
word “BY RUSSIANS” is written with for the sake of two “”, but you on- fig, you not Russian, since you do not love and do not wish to teach the Russian language.





Now I begin. Those statements Of , and Moroz which will be connected for the sake of the discussion me, will be ignored.
Thanks that it did not introduce me beside its black lists, although in me still everything is ahead.





I returned in order to receive pleasure based on the contact with the interesting people.
Selfishness. In this case it is necessary to still provide pleasure to others from its contact, and to be interesting collocutor.
Well and now about the main thing (for me).
I will agree whose- that by statement about the fact that some poor people for some reason are encountered on your route. It is interesting that the term “poor” on your is applied down those, who drinks and smokes. It is strange, but in me overwhelming of friends and familiar smokes and drinks, and I do not suffer from the contact with them, although, I will be repeated, itself NEVER not saws smoked. Do not have any, I, certainly, also active fighter with these harmful habits, but i the methods others, , so to say. But here in you many friends, the same as you or you lone person? (by the way before they live lions, but not tigers).
Psgl, you be more simply and people will be extended to you!

[Bsgn]

So to be, somewhat I will amuse . You by the way can continue to translate my words. In you it came out well. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
Frost, you forced me to make an exclusion your amazingly foolish sayings. I do not wish you to offend. Simply I now will answer the pair of your questions and you will comprehend that everything was understandably originally.
“about what principle, you will decide who guilty, but who no?”
All people are originally innocent. If of the fault of that offended that I can arise, also, down the side of offender. Although the negative never is greeted. And this entire I already spoke. Indeed I said that will admonish only if offender it groundless offends that offended. Perhaps this understandably immediately?
I do not intend to judge down the execution; therefore he does not cost it relates down my selection so seriously. The main thing that most frequently I will be on the side groundless condemned.
Your comparison of orthographical errors for the sake of prostatitis greatly was pleased to me. But I think you strongly it exaggerated. If we compare you with the girl which I it gave home, section excited and when matter already fitted the sex you me you tell - turn off. But I speak - I love with the light, to me so it is more pleasant and it is simpler. If girl me then speaks that she because of this to me will not be, then its this matter, but if it begins me to tell that, the fact that I with the light to love this my poor side, that because of this the girls like Moroz will be constrained their of breasts and . I will say, and to me to girl in which breast ? Here therefore, friend my you were transmitted at the point of . To you indeed absolutely to spit will write I word “to ” with the letter about or with the letter and before the root. You itself said that to you increasingly for the sake of me connected in parallel, “not ” I you. So that you to me do soar then? Matter completely not errors, but before relation to me personally. And the girl, by whom I will be pleased, to appear apropos light will not be. Indeed this of not so is important before the sex as orthographical errors in text.
Now I will try not to answer. But that I can do when you you write stupidity. In this case indeed you me charge, arguing this by complete nonsense. Naturally in me appears the strong desire to to you that you they did not comprehend, so that you would remove your charges.
I will try more not to answer, only you occasions to me do not give if you please, Ata we so will argue … (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[Af dhI feef]

And the girl, by whom I will be pleased, to appear apropos light will not be
it will not be, it from you will go away after you by it you …
But you- that itself you do believe before the fact that you do speak?





who argue- that? Nekton and than not of . But they are foot , rest.
, early I to you + placed… To !

[nopoZ]

Mega-defender. Here only you again go away from the simple things, after rolling eyes to the sky and the lumen. You understand, when people about by something argue (offender and that offended) this as their personal disassemblies… when it interferes the third, then it (the third) begins to judge subjectively, exclusively from its considerations. As the saying goes, if they did not call, do not be thrust. And you do count yourself sufficient to competent that to comprehend sufficiently reasoned one person it did call another?
And judging as far as that as you relate down the arguments, then I can with the great portion of the probability that you judge will be is very subjectively. Let us recall at least your posts about the casino. You wrote tirade about that as they casino down the stocks, and he did not bring not one argument, besides “I somewhere heard”, “to me someone said”. I am agreeable, I can it could not find the confirmation of your words, but I at least gave the examples, which contradict your words.
Thus, nevertheless, answer a question, as far as what principles you will judge whom they did insult substantiated, but no?





Your comparison of orthographical errors for the sake of prostatitis greatly was pleased to me. But I think you strongly it exaggerated. If we compare you with the girl which I it gave home, section excited and when matter already fitted the sex you me you tell - turn off. But I speak - I love with the light, to me so it is more pleasant and it is simpler. If girl me then speaks that she because of this to me will not be, then its this matter, but if it begins me to tell that, the fact that I with the light to love this my poor side, that because of this the girls like Moroz will be constrained their of breasts and . I will say, and to me to girl in which breast ?
But if it does agree with the light? To you there will be , the it breast or does not have any? From this statement one should one… you especially whom , princess or , it breast or does not have any… to you the main thing, that everything was on your! Not important to eat in it or no, the main thing in order to on your - with the light. Or now you will again say that I did not correctly comprehend your thoughts? =)) I by the way, on that as you write beyond the forum, confirms your words. If man a little on your side, you is ready and to teach and for the sake of omasa to share (although this person, look above, it clearly said that to it this not interestingly) and beside to . Main thing that on your.





You itself said that to you increasingly for the sake of me connected in parallel, “not ” I you. So that you to me do soar then?
It is simple to . But you do think everything else who with you it does associate here, they do wish from you to something to learn? Or with the trembling before the heart they do wait your revelations and histories? ") , I think with you here all they associate exclusively to .





But that I can do when you you write stupidity. In this case indeed you me charge, arguing this by complete nonsense.
It is concrete. Where, when, with the quotations. But that you is similar down =)





Naturally in me appears the strong desire to to you that you they did not comprehend, so that you would remove your charges.
Explain, but not noy!!! You rag… if you do not listen to, you charge all for the sake of the fact that we blunt you do not understand. But, to and you us do not understand, consider our arguments foolish… but who from us it cried, who you ignored, who fled based on the forum… only you. You do speak next to you successful people? Nonsense… with the rag, number will be only rags. You simply extol them, because they attained more than you.
“not create to itself idol!”





I will try more not to answer, only you occasions to me do not give if you please, Ata we so will argue …
But you against any moment, again can go away based on =))

[Bsgn]

First about the pleasant: jhonysilver, sh@rip, MopoZ, with all on “plus” at the point of the fact that you spend your precious forces and time beyond the contact with the blunt-nose!
Now about the fact that it read.





Now I begin. Those statements Of , and Moroz which will be connected for the sake of the discussion me, will be ignored.
Thanks that it did not introduce me beside its black lists, although in me still everything is ahead.
Well and now about the main thing (for me).
I will agree whose- that by statement about the fact that some poor people for some reason are encountered on your route. It is interesting that the term “poor” on your is applied down those, who drinks and smokes. It is strange, but in me overwhelming of friends and familiar smokes and drinks, and I do not suffer from the contact with them, although, I will be repeated, itself NEVER not saws smoked. Do not have any, I, certainly, also active fighter with these harmful habits, but i the methods others, , so to say. But here in you many friends, the same as you or you lone person? (by the way before they live lions, but not tigers).
Psgl, you be more simply and people will be extended to you!
I am glad that you you understand that I I write one and also. Others me reproach before the fact that I before each subsequent statement to written earlier.
Well as to name you friendly if you name me blunt-nose. Indeed this is unpleasant to hear to any person. I that to you poor that did do? Is remembered I, when we about the ports did speak, you it did offend, but so this indeed at the point of the matter, or am unjust I? I again will repeat the fact that he wrote if we you will speak out ourselves about that what you do not know.
I did not wish to expand my black list. At the point of you it is necessary to in order to fall before it. If you wish there, continue to name me blunt-nose.
You indeed me do not know at all. Do not make hasty outputs.
Apropos the main thing for you.
You apparently when across the diagonal read he did not comprehend much. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
I earlier met only poor people. This fact that I myself then was poor. I scolded people, I scolded peace. But when to me downy that reason before me I in the world much new. Many of those people of which I considered poor they proved to be good. Also after I changed my relation to peace and people to me of they are pulled new good people and to be repelled poor. Now me encircle people, which love and respect me.
I equate the drinking and people not simply thus. I by the way said that NOT ALL people which smoke and drink they are poor.
Say to me, the head of the term, such as percentage of all crimes is completed before form? But there are tumbling people, which when sober- evil and when tumbling- good? I did not see, then I saw people, which when sober- good, but when they will drink they lose completely.
Why I did speak also about the smokers? Because judging as far as to my (possibly and inaccurate) evaluation, the majority of people, who smokes still and it drinks alcohol. But who smokes and does not drink people little. Based on this I consist that people which smoke faster still and they drink and it means they are potentially risky or poor. It is logical?
Is certain this only indirect indicators. Among my of also there are people which and they smoke and drink and they very good. I greatly love them and respect before what condition they . There are the not drinking and nonsmoking poor people. But them it is less. I indeed speak reasonable you . How here it is possible with me to ? But you that will mandatorily find where the not existing contradiction. .
Your methods are little effective.
Me hour four ago rang unknown fellow and asked so that I it would help to throw to smoke. My number to it wife gave which my residency card it caught. We with it agreed to be met through of days. But in you as successes, fighter against harmful habits? I do not condemn you, only you me do not if you please judge.
The friends of present in me it is small. Two fellows to me as brothers. We always rescue each other against the difficult moments. And three girls. They - my wealth. These are excellent girls, very clever and beautiful. I them greatly love and they me also, as brother it is certain. All my living before the different cities. We are encountered by m y not so frequently. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
But this does not prevent me from being lone person. All decisions I assume as a rule one. And only already after decision making I can consider him with the friends. All problems I also solve as a rule itself. I do not love to request whose- that of aid. Also friends little that know from my life. I am student and adviser. Therefore I and lone person and before also the time in me there are present, checked by time, friends. But familiar i have countless set. The pair of days ago me rang some Lena and it congratulated me with the holidays. We with it half-hour stirred, but I so did not comprehend that this above Lena such. To request it felt shy. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[nopoZ]

Do not make hasty outputs.
How much we here three, do consider? But in fact… outputs still early of =)))

[Bsgn]

And the girl, by whom I will be pleased, to appear apropos light will not be
it will not be, it from you will go away after you by it you …
But you- that itself you do believe before the fact that you do speak?
It will go away certainly if I to it I tire, but to be occupied by sex with the light it with me will be. And these are not the assumption, this the real case. Two girls of all, with which I fell, were constrained their body, although they were excellent. This apparently complex some was. I trained them to the sex with the light and this beginning pleases by them. We parted not for this reason.
The fact that you the head of member, not can or you do not wish to adjust slightly sex with the girl under yourself this your matter. I do not condemn you, but also you me do not judge. I am repeated.

[nopoZ]

of … the main thing by sex to be occupied with =))





I trained them to the sex with the light
This sensation, as if with the trips it fell… it trained. He did not propose, it did not reconvince… and it trained. There what pascal -))

[Bsgn]

-----… It is actually ridiculous…
But Che? I could be a good highly developed boat -. I answer down any statement before my address - you did not correctly comprehend me. Read . You incorrectly comprehended me. Read . (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) ") ") "))

[Af dhI feef]

Why I did speak also about the smokers? Because judging as far as to my (possibly and inaccurate) evaluation, the majority of people, who smokes still and it drinks alcohol. But who smokes and does not drink people little. Based on this I consist that people which smoke faster still and they drink and it means they are potentially risky or poor. It is logical?
Is certain this only indirect indicators. Among my of also there are people which and they smoke and drink and they very good. I greatly love them and respect before what condition they . There are the not drinking and nonsmoking poor people. But them it is less. I indeed speak reasonable you . How here it is possible with me to ? But you that will mandatorily find where the not existing contradiction. .
Before this paragraph some contradictions, are formed impression, that you forget that, about which he wrote minute ago.





But in you as successes, fighter against harmful habits?
none, I to itself place such global tasks of altering peace, in me grows the son, also, for me now the main thing to bring up from it man!





I that to you poor that did do? Is remembered I, when we about the ports did speak, you it did offend, but so this indeed at the point of the matter, or am unjust I?
not combat, I not rancorous…

[Bsgn]

But yes where there contradiction that? Well describe to me. I all correctly wrote precisely since I think.
I do not say the conflicting things. Is a majority of they drink, but not all. Majorities - poor people, tons can make of thing. Means the drinking men potentially poor person. But this does not mean that all and the drinking people poor. Where the contradiction?
By the way, I do not also place to itself the global tasks of altering peace. I people help therefore me it pleases people to help. I try also to only my surrounding peace so that to me it would live comfortably.

[fonAt]

I returned in order to receive pleasure based on the contact with the interesting people.
Pravda this is complicated, when they name me mad
Well this zh indeed essence does not change…
people as were interesting so also remained ")…
before what complexity- that? …





Well then beside the thematic branch go…
Surely it is worthwhile to ignore the statements Of , and Moroz.
Give, be drawn off already…
the second time will be easier than the first)…
You indeed is agreeable with me, Moroz. Why you do argue?
In order to you me by the ostrich not of =)
Frost, in them with the ostriches is one commonality, which does not concern you…
eyes are more than the brain…
Here recently film moved out - tough nut 4. bright illustration of my words.
Recently moved out still “predator against the stranger: requiem”, the bright illustration of my nightmares…
But very long it moved out film “10