Medvedev - president RF.

[Af dhI feef]

It is today declared about the advancement from four batches of uniform presidential nominee RF of Dmitriy Medvedev. I so understand Medvedev and it will be for the next four years. In whom what thoughts in regard to this?

[lAot]

I count worthy candidate, nothing poor say I can, good the fact that of of Putin, successfully it conducts, it continues and I hope it will continue the line of present president.

[nekI]

of fief, you do not give to people the third version of response…
type - “it refrained”… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[dhI stutInt]

But I Ivanov wish…! "))
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant





But I Ivanov wish…! "))
before the meaning before presidents “I do wish”? … or since I ? … ")….

[lAot]

Ivanov is also of current it old already, and secondly down it and so much that is what laid.

[Af dhI feef]

Yes I here also “Ivanov wished”, pleases me he as politician, but fall in love president to him not to be. Medvedev also worthy candidate, so that get accustomed… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[BrAktIk]

For me - the best selection from the real…
Ivanov and cause emetic reaction…
and Medvedev… I hope, in the course of time smoothly corrects the course of Putin… down the side of mind…





Prices of oil did not conduct it…
Sole - low growth pricks up ears… can, by way of exception, sick pride he does not have…

[dhI stutInt]

before the meaning before presidents “I do wish”? … or since I ? … ")….
Of … that about … and you have one sex on the mind. .)))
root, you old itself… A Ivanov before the very to juice) "
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant





of fief, you do not give to people the third version of a response… of the type - “he refrained”… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
- “abstention” they cancelled. Is declared with all of Hu from Hu, only complete by of the type " " of down the selections, although it can therefore they did not set so that “it would accompany” on “democratic” selections. Remained details - to gather the signatures of all agreeable, but disagreeing - are not considered.





and Medvedev… I hope, in the course of time smoothly corrects the course of Putin… down the side of mind…
- deeply I doubt, not for this it is set.





Sole - low growth pricks up ears… can, by way of exception, sick pride he does not have…
- you will recall Napoleon.
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[BrAktIk]

and Medvedev… I hope, in the course of time smoothly corrects the course of Putin… down the side of mind…
- deeply I doubt, not for this it is set.
I doubt… but indeed and Putin was “not for that it was set”… chance low, but there is…





Sole - low growth pricks up ears… can, by way of exception, sick pride he does not have…
- you will recall Napoleon.
Did not comprehend - for you Napoleon, this is a positive or negative example?
I here precisely of low rulers fear… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[nIst]

that selection in fact the snow crust and do not have, is said - Medvedev, here there will be Medvedev. But voting, bulletins - formality is one.

[fonAt]

that selection in fact the snow crust and do not have, is said - Medvedev, here there will be Medvedev. But voting, bulletins - formality is one.

[fonAt]

fanat, - it from the regime or from the authority does not depend, its grows before the directly proportional dependence to your … so that yet not the evening, do not be disturbed…
But concerning the fact that nothing was changed in 15 years - you know wonderful that I with you will not agree… Me personally is tripled succession with which they will put “rod” from one clone to another. Predictability and forecastability. Is possible something to plan and not to fear (about the great count) of any “Pavlovskys” of reforms or black Tuesday- Thursdays… To us before the 90th it was gay, will suffice …
Me does not triple that impudence for the sake of which they spread the country, even without trying to hide this insolently… … appeared the desire not at all to go down the selections - there to make, even if then everything solved…

[Somfolter]

Loathsomely. Stability such is vile - but also it will not be, slow (as the minimum) drift down the side of an increase in the abomination occurs continuously. On me, so the promoted worker of Putin cannot be good regarding. One ought not, , to wait from this authority of something good - at least, disappointment so does not threaten. There will be radical change of power - we will live. No - it means no. This must be known just as the impossibility without the miracle to create perpetual motion machine.

[SIleM]

I count worthy candidate, nothing poor say I can, good the fact that of of Putin, successfully it conducts, it continues and I hope it will continue the line of present president.
But what the present president has line?





you is unjust! Much was changed. Standard of living did fall? It fell. Opposition where? They aligned with the earth. But law about the selections? Disgrace, but not law. But pay medicine? But pay formation? Thanks to Putin, to father native, at the point of ! so that changes in bulk, do not slander (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)





Loathsomely. Stability such is vile - but also it will not be, slow (as the minimum) drift down the side of an increase in the abomination occurs continuously. On me, so the promoted worker of Putin cannot be good regarding. One ought not, , to wait from this authority of something good - at least, disappointment so does not threaten. There will be radical change of power - we will live. No - it means no. This must be known just as the impossibility without the miracle to create perpetual motion machine.
But here now I will agree with you. It will be more badly. But it is not necessary to wait radical change of power. Who it will replace? The people is satisfied, but who is not satisfied, that is silent…

[Af dhI feef]

Comforter, and whom from the present politicians, known or less known you do see against the post of president? What authority must arrive, that we did heal well? There will not be disappointments before “new” authority, but if it will be, then as it is frequently necessary to alter “courses”?
fanat, with any authority will “official ”, “recoils” and so forth, so for which change then that the fact that they did produce it does for years and have a stability?

[gagu911]

even I do not know. to. it will exactly be or not… direct your country it will be Putin. to. it is living!

[nIst]

By the way, Medvedev - practically the same growth as Putin… Attentively you will look on the photo-raffia.
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[Somfolter]

Comforter, and whom from the present politicians, known or less known you do see against the post of president? What authority must arrive, that we did heal well? There will not be disappointments before “new” authority, but if it will be, then as it is frequently necessary to alter “courses”?
I at the point of Oleg . Unfortunately, he thus far relates “to less well-known” politicians.
Here here something about it: http://limta.ro/niv/14161248/
It is necessary to assume, information truthful. But for some reason (although it is understandable why) it is not indicated that it supports the reception of law about the responsibility of the authority:





But indeed I, for example, at the point of it mainly for this very reason. It is good, when a good person comes beside the authority. But, unfortunately, in order to there , man must possess some qualities, which extremely rarely are combined with the concept “good person” (the brightest exclusion - Stalin, but how much to wait his ?). Therefore the law, which limits penetration beside the authority of poor people, is necessary, and it forces them to perform, as if good. Then disappointment before the recurrent authority it is considerably less (tons to authority it will be strongly interested before the disappointment, but now by it - on the whole, to spit). And “courses” be changed even if will be, then down the side of improvement for the people, and not conversely.
Here here is given the criticism Of and the criticism of the criticism:

[Af dhI feef]

Comforter, all understandably from where wind blows… No already I I do not personally consider Stalin “good person”, and it is understandable why. So I think that of the enemies “of the course of Putin” they hardly wish “ of Stalin”. I against , the main thing at the point of one reason - do not wish to live before the country, which frequently alters course radically.
gugu911, you do not know? Nevertheless? Do not climb then! Themselves let us be dismantled.

[MiCtIon]

Is today declared about the advancement from four batches of uniform candidate at the point of the post Dmitriy Medvedev's RF. I so understand Medvedev and it will be for the next four years. In whom what thoughts in regard to this?

[SIleM]

I do not wish to live before the country, which frequently alters course radically.
But if it does go by inaccurate course, then let stably it does go further?

[Af dhI feef]

Siren, but who decides that we we do go not by accurate course? I? You? Comforter? ? We are still screws before this play with ANY AUTHORITY. I count that the policy and saving complex things there is no unique solution of various questions, and for the fact that to be convinced that course accurate/inaccurate is must that the past definite quantity of time, yes even to all you will not please. Therefore I consider that most simply thus to sit and to consider “accurate whether we by road go, comrades” how to make some real matters.
For me those, who promise “the earth to peasants, mill by worker” down the new harmony, yes plus to this from the shortest periods to raise pensions, grants, wages and so forth - these are people are striven strive to fall by any price beside the authority. I, man not having economic formation, I understand that this be it cannot, but even if can, then to the detriment of something other.

[SIleM]

Siren, I consider that everything is done in - correctly and it is sufficiently discovered, it is logical and it is sound.





P.S. Of was about Medvedev, / we again go away from the theme.
To prove easily, but only when you the value of democracy. But if “democracy is good, but not for us, and without it let us live”, then to begin there is no meaning. But can “from it harm one”?





Siren +1 at the point of . Joke was estimated. It smiled…

[Ed Is free]

I will say this is what. my , learned in one school with the son of this Medvedev himself. we drank with it and still then he indicated that the following president will be , .. This matter long ago, in 2005. you so that speak here, you consider, who poor, who good and in reality entire already is long ago solved at the point of you.
Almost no one and you is conjectured, that the majority of people, on this forum in particular, voted ABOVE it was ursine, not because it such good. even matter not before that, it or is good as president. Matter in media outlets, in , before praseodymium - which years down 5 , beside the federal the canals, which wash to you the brains day above the day, showing fattened being smiled Medvedev's face. AH, what good person! give it before presidents!!

[Somfolter]

Slightly , but it forced, me seems, I am obligated to answer.





Before his 70 he is stronger than many of us. But if we recall Yeltsin - in 1996. to it was temporarily less (to what extent I remember, rivals its everything they were younger), and in this case it was and appeared by absolute wreck.
Strictly, and one of the main reasons of the popularity of Putin - external contrast with Yeltsin. Instead of the heavily sick dipsomaniac, not capable of connecting two words, was proposed not drinking, the athlete, with the suspended language - almost exact repetition of situation with Gorbachev against the background his precursors.
Why such double standards?





Comforter, all understandably from where wind blows… No already I I do not personally consider Stalin “good person”, and it is understandable why.
Yes even to me it is, unfortunately, understandable, why: “… Today practically each day (!) on TV, radio, before the printed media outlets it is possible to see, to hear or to read anything negative about that period of our history (30-50- e years). Quite strange consists before the fact that indeed Stalin already very long died, its companions-in-arms died. Past it is already more than 10 years, as ceased to exist the USSR. Contemporary “Communists” (Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Zyuganov and to) present no real threat to the ruling regime RF. But with zealous perseverance every day of the week media outlet is continued to speak us: “Stalin tyrant”, “Stalin is poor”, “the USSR - the empire of evil” and so forth and the like why they so do persist? You will request itself: “WHY?”.
For the historical truth and the validity? This before our- that pragmatic time, when each minute before tele-ether does cost sizable money? It is ridiculous! … Then why? …
Many “crimes”, assigned today to the USSR as a whole or personally to Stalin, pursue only the one target - to create inaccurate representation about that period of the history of our country, when we were strong, respected and not beyond whom by the not dependant power…
Many Russians today still something know, they remember something about the old times, and they can say: “Stand! But indeed it was once differently! Earlier we were strong and respected!”. Children will hear these words, they will begin to be interested, to pose questions. Here for them cast media outlets their mud: “Yes, they were strong, but indeed then it was so badly - solid GULAG, repression and any freedom!”. Then now, kiddies, the complete freedom: to learn not necessarily, it is possible to wash glasses “of Mercedes”, and down earned thus money to freely buy beer, cigarettes, narcotics… On the whole, we drive out “Pepsi” and we learn by heart the tongue twister: “Stalin, repression, GULAG”. Only before this cluster in you, children, must come down the mind Stalin's name…”
Here completely article, theme is in general wider, article great and interesting:





But about Medvedev - if before the candidates will remain only it and (for the appearance of democracy) several down it the similar, then it is better and these selections to ignore. But about the fact that all at the point of us solved - thus far to still before our forces not drink beer, not to smoke tobacco, not to look series, to without … already this for them knife is sharp.

[LIjIo]

I do not surely have a law here generally to write, tons to I am not national RF… but nevertheless…
driving out between Ivanov and Medvedev I it would select the second. and when its , then even it was gladdened at the point of Russia…

[nIst]

Ligia, that does mean “you do not have the law to write”??? I do not know as in our country, but on our forum democracy exists!!! Before questions of the policy it is already precisely…

[SIleM]

and these selections to ignore. But about the fact that all at the point of us solved - thus far to still before our forces not drink beer, not to smoke tobacco, not to look series, to without … already this for them knife is sharp.
On no account to ignore! To go and to vote against, i.e., at the point of the oppositional candidate!
Knife is sharp for whom? For the herdsman from the rams? Do not amuse…





and when its , then even it was gladdened at the point of Russia…
These are democratic elections or bureaucratic fuss? What above “successor”? 21- y century outside! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[BrAktIk]

These are democratic elections or bureaucratic fuss? What above “successor”? 21- y century outside! (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
You will laugh, but the presence of Putin before the list of united Russia - step to , it seems me. If still it entered this party, and before “the three” it was not “triune”…
But then precisely it would advance Medvedev, and it would come out culturally. Specifically, batches advance candidates, and the approval of candidature by the leader of batch - normal matter.
To this scheme to us far, but all after all this “successor” to such an extent did not fall based on the sky as previous…
The inequality of conditions with the stirring - this is another theme, I now not about this…

[SIleM]

You will laugh, but the presence of Putin before the list of united Russia - step to , it seems me. If still it entered this party, and before “the three” it was not “triune”…
But then precisely it would advance Medvedev, and it would come out culturally. Specifically, batches advance candidates, and the approval of candidature by the leader of batch - normal matter.
To this scheme to us far, but all after all this “successor” to such an extent did not fall based on the sky as previous…
The inequality of conditions with the stirring - this is another theme, I now not about this…
No longer it is ridiculous… I about the same: nomination - is normal. “The designation of successor”, as our television sets are expressed are not.





we drank with it and still then he indicated that the following president will be , .. This matter long ago, in 2005. you so that speak here, you consider…
- I when tumbling, yet not that speak… but the same nothing it means - truth know only I and the small group of those of particularly approximated…
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[Somfolter]

On no account to ignore! To go and to vote against, i.e., at the point of the oppositional candidate!
Knife is sharp for whom? For the herdsman from the rams? Do not amuse…
It is difficult to say, but only this thought heats me: nevertheless before the election commission and before the observers simple, dependant people. And let they will write before the record sheet as by them , but themselves they will see, how many voters they joined by force, and how much voted for the sake of struts. Although by them food for the speculations and for the stories.
Knife sharp - can, and is strongly said, but nevertheless any good deed for them interference, it forces them to use other means, than it was planned (rougher and less elegant, they they have the unpredictable side effects). Literally any good deed - to help to throw far away something somewhere, to refrain from the conflict somewhere before the trolley, and that to extinguish the conflict… The same reduces the level of atrocity - and it little by little confuses by them maps. Some in me today Internet…

[SIleM]

The people is satisfied, but who is not satisfied, that is silent…

[SIleM]

The people is satisfied, but who is not satisfied, that is silent…





But perhaps the results of voting do not say more eloquently than any “some”?

[gagu911]

only of to correct… Putin calls!

[Af dhI feef]

gugu911, is not ridiculous…

…





Ridiculous you, children. Although no, I understand you. Those, who have their matter naturally it fears everything to lose (well or generally something to lose). Hence and disturbance. Certainly, as here to not be stirred up, when take away the sweet abutments of the 90th (namely “that I wish, then I will turn”).
Young people of up to 25 years down that and young people in order to be stirred up this understandably. We do not know, about which we say, but they heard somewhere that politician Putin it was abnormal.
Not floodplain one. Here you will grumble, that the USSR is the paradise of terrestrial, and now nonsense on the vegetable oil. But when they try to do singularly accurate precisely for OUR country version (for as still possible, when entire its history Russia mother strand under the oppression, even overthrow of tsarism did not retract dictatorship, but only increased it?)- again they are stirred up… to you that necessarily? Always is delirium of the 90th? But they did see satisfactory democracy of states or equality the European Union and did want so? DOES NOT CAN Russia so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Our people has the mentality of another.
You do believe before of other candidates? Well do not be constrained, vote immediately at the point of Nemtsov! It to you rapidly the country democratizes and tsar will return, as this one time already did.
Yes comprehend that the country to raise after the disintegration of the 90's, with the collapsed saving and the distrust of other countries is complicatedly improbable! But in 4 years of presidency, as many candidates promise, this before principle is impossible. This on the present the long journey, down which now we moved out. One I can say exact Putin before the eyes of the world public Russia already it raised. And states it already fear, that by the evidently unarmed view. But this is the principal indicator of the fact that Russia is treated.
And for this very reason I at the point of Medvedev.

[BrAktIk]

But they did see satisfactory democracy of states or equality the European Union and did want so? DOES NOT CAN Russia so!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Our people has the mentality of another.
To go “western” route not guarantee.
Only here not one country of world, which goes “as far as different way”, normally lives.
Mentality this piece… it is changed…





But to kick now the 90th is fashionable… Would wish I to look, as Putin he would taxi with those prices of oil, and the situation… But can, and he would not wish… It is terrible… For which to Yeltsin to pray is necessary - that “great” Civil War it did not allow… as in Yugoslavia…
Reasons and proofs before other themes seek.

Mentality this piece… it is changed…
I take beside the attention the mentality of the not separately undertaken person, but the whole country. I do not consider that the nation, which lives about its laws of century or even (any country) - will change its sight of peace. Or you do believe before the democratization beside the next centuries of oriental countries? In vain there is no concept “mysterious Russian soul”, not we it devised. Russia would always go by the individual means of development, how much it they did not try “to Europeanize”





But to kick now the 90th is fashionable…
the 90th I do not kick, but I relate by that time with the horror. With a healthy feeling of horror.





Would wish I to look, as Putin he would taxi with those prices of oil, and the situation… But can, and he would not wish… It is terrible… For which to Yeltsin to pray is necessary - that “great” Civil War it did not allow… as in Yugoslavia…

[SIleM]

I do not consider that the nation, which lives about its laws…
Laws in ALL countries are different.





Russia would always go by the individual means of development, how much it they did not try “to Europeanize”
… glory to god, that sometimes they tried! Represent Russia without the Petrovskiy reforms (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)… it's a pity, little tried.
Mentality? Give better to say “backwardness”. When in Russia they cancelled serfdom, before London released the metro… We on the same route, only far from behind. Here and entire “”. Well, there is some national specificity, of course, but nothing fatal, nothing insurmountable, nothing, which would not be encountered earlier before the history of other countries. ? (I anticipate your response, usually speak about this (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)) A read a little about England the colonial period: one beside one. Something still? Name.





People occupied the head of authority, being softly expressed, not professionals, who thirst the so desired and once unrealizable authority. They did not manage.
But who professionals? Nowhere they learn to control the countries. And it is already those more in the KGB. Nearest of all to this economists, jurist still hither and thither, and God of from the power figures!
But why they did not manage? Exactly after all they managed. Here only saving - vehicle inertial, clumsy. Years down that are necessary, so that the results of reforms would have effect on the welfare of the people. These years passed. It is not here only necessary to praise that only, who gathered crop, it is necessary to give credit down volume, who ploughed and sowed field.





Putin puts to use much more humane methods, you will notice, (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)). Or you do wish to argue beyond this theme?
But this with which to compare! With the fascism? With the Western countries? Humane I these methods to name . Yes, there are no mass shootings. Hurray? So the previous chiefs, besides the grand-dad of Stalin, by these did not sin. At the point of that zh to him glory- that? Before what humanity?





I do not think that to Putin this is unknown. This is too far-sighted policy.
Before what its foresight? Annihilation of opposition is farsighted? It can be, if its target - totalitarianism. However, this did not help tsar …

[BrAktIk]

Mentality this piece… it is changed…
I take beside the attention the mentality of the not separately undertaken person, but the whole country. I do not consider that the nation, which lives about its laws of century or even (any country) - will change its sight of peace. Or you do believe before the democratization beside the next centuries of oriental countries? In vain there is no concept “mysterious Russian soul”, not we it devised. Russia would always go by the individual means of development, how much it they did not try “to Europeanize”
Certainly I believe. For example, Japan became the efflorescent country - disregarding besides “samurai” warlike mentality. There are there too many differences so that it would become the straight example for Russia. But very combination “western” route and maintained national characteristics IMHO - an example. Mentality with the creak (consequence “samurai” model - many suicides), but is changed. After act of terror on September 11 (Twin Towers) to the USA precisely Japanese commands passed world championships on several I see sport, fearing acts of terror…
Of course I also about the mentality of the country.





If we recall a drop in the tsarism and the disintegration of the USSR it is possible to draw parallels. Were developed relatively equally before these both times of event. People occupied the head of authority, being softly expressed, not professionals, who thirst the so desired and once unrealizable authority. They did not manage. The plunder of the country was unavoidable, but not worthy of approval. Then person, who joined the alliance arrived against the authority,
Here I such “cohesion of alliance” according to Lenin/to Milosevic with the horror waited. Glory to god, that Yeltsin did not yield to temptation, and we were bridged without the horrors “great” Civil War.
Alliance - not self-worth. It is more important, as people they live.





But by no means you will leave I do not think on the petroleum that to Putin this is unknown. This is too far-sighted policy.
However, it will go. It would be farsighted, and not - it would place money from the petroleum muff first of all beside the science and formation, yes from those desiring to so that work after teachers and scientists (in Russia!) turn would stand.

[Somfolter]

Meeting in the small industrial enterprise of the Permian period. Before the hall of men 150. After discussion of general questions the word of the director:





All being present raise hands.
- It is good. Now raise hands in whom cell phones with the cameras?





It is excellent! I hope, everyone knows that on December 2 the selections of Deputies of the State Duma. It's no secret to anyone, what party must conquer on these selections. Therefore all must arrive down the selections with its telephones. To take bulletin, to visit beside the cabin, to place mark opposite “united Russia” and to photograph this beyond the cell phone. But in order to be by completely confident before your free , before the photograph it must be present the turn of log book. the 3rd on Monday general foremen will check your telephones. Those, who ignore my request, expect unbleached measures - up to leave. Thanks at the point of the correct understanding of the policy of batch. All are free”.
(hence: http://doil.lo/200541/?51_1_1)
How, to spue does not pull?
and sh@rip are right before the fact that the West - this is bad. But Siren and Praktik before the fact that - is bad. Matter above the low - to join these two sensible thoughts.

[BrAktIk]

naive… did forget, probably after whom Medvedev he does work? …
You did not forget, after whom Putin during Yeltsin's lifetime/To did work? But nature took its…
Medvedev - typical “botanist”, boy from the professorial family… plus several times took off phrases reasonable - about the YUKOS, about sovereign democracy… down this and hope… although, I do not argue, weak…
give god to Medvedev high prices of oil!





It would be farsighted, and not …
- affirmation. of by man of year, and already whom- whom, and it is difficult to accuse them besides the bias…
Well, besides positiveness me to like accuse difficultly. Certainly, debatable. But “after the person of year” recognized the log Of time. It notes man “of that influenced” more than others - independent of “the sign” of this effect. I.e., “the person of the year” Of time - not “best” person of year, but “influenced itself” what that. Among “the people of the year” Of time there were, for example, Hitler, Stalin and .

[SIleM]

therefore before these “flourishing and foremost” civilizations the educated Europeans and Americans fire back their classmates from the rifled weapon each week on ten…
First, strongly it exaggerated.
In the second place, in the USA - yes, but not in Canada, let us say, and not in France, and not in Europe generally.
Before the third, the more evil the regime, the less the crimes. In the prison generally there are no murders and that?





But coma to raise wage - not ? Or an increase in the wage - generally?
Heard this statement of local official from the formation (it heard personally, not for the press it was said): “To raise wage to teachers? Why? Nevertheless ” hair they arose by from such a relation to the people. Yes, they , but the more qualified personnel will arrive down the increased wage, competition beside the pedagogical institutes will be raised, the quality of training will be improved. Yes, not immediately, will be required years perhaps but indeed and effect will be long-term!





Although, it is here clear - in whom which aches.
But well why to resort down the small bites? Always in someone something aches…, also, in you also. And, by the way, it can ache not only for its purse, while also at the point of the country, at the point of the native land, at the point of the people. It occurs, visualize… But indeed to our children to live before this country, to be this people… It is shorter, it is not necessary all to reduce down the sausage!

[SIleM]

this is the widely proclaimed and known pre-election canard and nothing more… if this was truth, then really you do think that all together -- would not be engaged before this fact by teeth and struts??? I think that they would be engaged…
Widely proclaimed? By whom? “United Russia”? But more not whom access to the political advertisement had…





and it is not necessary to believe to everything that they do write before the newspapers of the type “MK” or the service lives of the type “morning” or “NG”… they do there constantly write that algorithmic control system constantly become pregnant, but permanently does die from what- that -there unknown, but something there with the breast… but we all do relate down this peacefully and adequately, all this as integral part of the yellow press, it is correct?
But yellow press about similar does not write. Why by it trouble? But that they will replace editor in chief, as before “Moscow news” there is no problem… And wolves are satisfied, and sheep are whole. Here and sold, latter, whose news could be looked…

[SIleM]

and sh@rip are right before the fact that the West - this is bad. But Siren and Praktik before the fact that - is bad. Matter above the low - to join these two sensible thoughts.
“… ice and …”
“First to be delimited, then to be joined!” (..) (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)





It notes man “of that influenced” more than others - independent of “the sign” of this effect.
- themselves to , which is attracted at the point of the ears, but nevertheless oppression its line… In any event, even if with the sign “minus” - this person cannot be . Or can? To me it is very interesting to eat argument…





In the second place, in the USA - yes, but not in Canada, let us say, and not in France, and not in Europe generally.
- if Finland - not Europe, the fact that?





Before the third, the more evil the regime, the less the crimes. In the prison generally there are no murders and that?
- Siren, by such affirmations you can easily drive in yourselves beside the pit (blind alley), from where then it cannot be from there been selected. You will damage to itself mood.





Yes, they , but the more qualified personnel will arrive down the increased wage, competition beside the pedagogical institutes will be raised, the quality of training will be improved.
- no, unfortunately it will not be raised, not they , it will not be improved… This is the process not of one month, but several years, if not several decades. When it will begin from where to take money in the development of fundamental science - here then this will become prestigious and only then it will be possible to undertake similar steps. But any free unplanned sum besides the access - plus to inflation and minus to the GDP .





“To raise wage to teachers? Why? Nevertheless they ”… Yes, they …





It is shorter, it is not necessary all to reduce down the sausage!
- Siren, you will be determined.





Widely proclaimed? By whom? “United Russia”? But more not whom access to the political advertisement had… But yellow press about similar does not write.
- Siren, about similar writes the newspaper “duel”. Here reference - http://duin.lo/000781/?51_1_1. certainly, it is possible to attempt to name this analytical publication, but I personally will refrain. Yellow press.





But well why to resort down the small bites? Always in someone something aches…, also, in you also. And, by the way, it can ache not only for its purse, while also at the point of the country, at the point of the native land, at the point of the people. It occurs, visualize… But indeed to our children to live before this country, to be this people…
- and you me do not shame. about the patriotism, a feeling of the civic duty and everything else. I gave that assumed down state, moreover so it is qualitative, which is better and not to remember. And in contrast to some, I and now actually take in itself from THE PERSONAL pocket and give to my city, yard, my neighbors and neighborly children - friends of my children, moreover beyond the private venture and out of any batches and movements, it is simple because I consider this correct and know as that to make. But you?
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

Laws in ALL countries are different
I bear in mind not the constitution of the country, but unwritten laws.





Mentality? Give better to say “backwardness”. When in Russia they cancelled serfdom, before London released the metro…
You speak about the backwardness of the country before the technical sense and , distinguishing of the equality between this backwardness and national mentality. I bear in mind another entirely. Mentality this is the viewpoint of nation (before the 2nd words). Our country thinks of differently from the West, otherwise than the east. If we recall history and geography Russia it relates not down whatever the to the side of light, and at the point of the elongation of all existence it underwent the effect also of the West, and the east. You so does not please word . But, as is known, words from the song you will not throw out. Russia transferred it in centuries. And when Europe fall under the struts of fascism Russia it kept balance it is no secret that matter before the force of spirit and the global patience. From where it did undertake? This is named “not to get accustomed…”. From the Mongolian yoke to the disintegration of the USSR the Russian people lived under the oppression. And strange instructions became their own. But what there can be democracy, if man of his opinion does not have because “to leadership more visible”?
You speak, that people of - media outlet, government and so forth
But indeed it is not possible something to suggest to man, if it has already the point of view. Perhaps no? What will be with the country, if authority was given properly down people, triple we democracy? Apparently anarchy. I consider that our country even longer centuries will not become properly democratic it is not ready for this. And matter not before of the beards
and to building the metro.





But who professionals? Nowhere they learn to control the countries
If we do not take beside the detachment of the professions, received before VUZ (Institute of Higher Education), it is possible to answer as far as one phrase “if it will given more than be. If no, you will excuse”. Why in your opinion some people good , and others of the hands there poor?





It is not here only necessary to praise that only, who gathered crop, it is necessary to give credit down volume, who ploughed and sowed field.
On your Putin nothing did do, but only he does sit in glory on the monasteries?





However, it will go. It would be farsighted, and not - it would place money from the petroleum muff first of all beside the science and formation, yes from those desiring to so that work after teachers and scientists (in Russia!) turn would stand.
You forget, before what country we live. Besides petroleum much what exists. To live due to the petroleum and other natural resources these are not “”, is this, if you wish, market foreign relations. All countries so live, if there is a possibility. Now money placed beside all spheres, but gradually. If we a little think over, you will comprehend, down what it can lead the provision of one area, to the detriment of all others.





therefore before these “flourishing and foremost” civilizations the educated Europeans and Americans fire back their classmates from the rifled weapon each week on ten…
Well this, let us say, is guilty not democracy, but lack of spirtituality.





Widely proclaimed? By whom? “United Russia”? But more not whom access to the political advertisement had…
Open watered stirring SPS and still the rank of large batches, including . You precisely the same charges. All this not is more than . Long ago it is already time to discontinue to believe to similar dragnets. As, , and to promise to one batch “to give down the share of Gazprom to pensioners”. You are bought down this, down the fact that will give instead of ruble 2 in the month, and then you complain, which deceives…

[Somfolter]

Siren, about similar writes the newspaper “duel”. Here reference - http://doen.ro/250711/?51_1_1. certainly, it is possible to attempt to name this analytical publication, but I personally will refrain. Yellow press.





Who does not know - its characteristic before the fact that the fees do not pay to the authors. Something of itself so that is not required to extort by it, but they write when there is that to say. In spite of the absence there are no fees, deficiency before the authors, and on the contrary, limits newspaper place. The graphomaniacs Of he tries to intercept, and normal people write about the fact that they know. Pluralism before the newspaper it is full, strictly, and name symbolizes the collision of opinions. Is not constrained to print the articles, where it proves, that it itself nonsense wrote, and also abuse before its address. One of my commanders, completely not foolish person, when duel” for the first time " saw, were : “Well to what the vile newspaper, to what evil! ”… But itself then regularly requested to give to read a little new number…

[BrAktIk]

Now money placed beside all spheres, but gradually. If we a little think over, you will comprehend, down what it can lead the provision of one area, to the detriment of all others.
About the one-sided development to me and to reflect not necessary. It suffices to recall the USSR. They placed everything beside the military industrial complex. This I do not wish. But we go now, going back, precisely, down that side (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
Now you will think over - and that we actually have at the point of the export, besides petroleum/of gas? In the forseeable future? Therefore I think that our chance now, until makes it possible petroleum superprofit, to develop as far as the surpassing rates science/formation and tourism. IM