Great press conference of Vladimir Putin

[gagu911]

Responses of the president RF of Vladimir Putin down questions of the journalists
Vladimir Putin: The respected friends, associate, I am glad to greet you against our traditional rendezvous and will permit itself to begin, as usual, based on summing up of the results of previous, 2007. At the point of me it is necessary to repeat some numbers, I will do this very briefly. But some things I will nevertheless repeat and will do this with the pleasure, because 2007 were successful. It suffices to say that the growth of saving comprised, as to you it is already well known, 8,1 percent, this is one of the greatest results in recent years. We, as you know, if we count on the parity of purchasing power, if we count the capacity of saving, bridged such countries “of eight” as Italy and France, and Russia as far as the capacity of saving now occupies the seventh place in the world according to the data of international experts. The real income of nationals grew by 10,4 percent, real wages - as far as 16,2 percent. Here real pension - down 3,8. These are also plus, also higher than inflation as far as 3,8, but nevertheless an increase in the pension considerably lags as an increase in the wages. Therefore since February 1 we already increased insurance, this year, already increased the insurance unit of the pension by 12 percent, since April 1 predicts the second increase in the insurance unit of the pension as far as 7,5 percent, and the since August 1 present years - increase in the base unit of the pension as far as 15 percent. In this case I would wish especially to note and to stress that we will attentively follow the fact, as situation with the inflation is developed, government will this must make mandatorily and adjust an increase in the pension income in accordance with this macroeconomic indicator.
Successfully realizes demographic project. I this note with the particular pleasure and the satisfaction, because, as you know, I about this already spoke repeatedly, there were many doubts, those measures, which we assume before the sphere of demography, will be effective. It seemed that this generally non-hoisting matter. Meanwhile an increase in fertility dynamics of population was greatest in 2007 in 25 years, and children was born so much, as it was not born in the last 15 years. It is especially important and especially to me it is pleasant to note, we will achieve directly that goal, which was placed before ourselves: was increased, considerably was increased a quantity of second and third children before the families, by 10 percent. Based on 33 percent of approximate to 43-42 percent.
In this case we index how promised, all allowances before this sphere, including maternal capital. If you remember, we began based on 250 thousand rubles - maternal capital comprised, then in 2008 it will already be 271 thousand, and 2010- m are planned approximately 307 thousand, depending on that how we will manage the inflation. I wish to certify our nationals, that the state and in the future will strictly follow the fulfillment of commitments before this sphere. Population with the substandard incomes, you know that this is one of our great, acute problems - poverty of population. But I wish to note with the satisfaction that if in 2000 we considered that in our country more than 30 percent of population as a result of the poverty line are located, then in 2005, I dynamics will very briefly give, this was 17,7 percent, beside 2006 - 15,3 percent, and beside 2007 - already less than 14 percent. Decreased the number of unemployed, in all there four, four with small of million. Industrial of production shows a good dynamics of growth. For the years 2005 and 2006 an increase in the industrial production did not exceed four percent. In 2007 it was already 6,3 percent.
The machining branches of the industry gladdened: in 2005 - 5,7 percent, 2006 - 4,4 percent, and beside 2007 - this already of 9,1 percent. Some branches grew simply by very high rates. I have in mind not only the sphere of services, but, let us say, and construction, you about this you know well, 20 percent approximately, before the housing it is still more. This is already similar down the structural boom in the country.
And fixed asset formation - greatest at the point of entire of the previous eight years. Similar it was not even in 2000, when an increase in the saving was 10 percent. Fixed asset formation were 21,1 percent. The pure influx of the private capital beside the Russian Federation was in the past year 83,2 billion dollars. This is two times more than in 2006, two times. The financial condition of our country is fortified. (international liquidity) were increased as far as 170 billion dollars and they approach a mark beside of US dollars, it is more exact than 478,6 billions according to the latest data. Barely there decrease occurred in connection with a change in the exchange value of dollar.
is 3,84 trillion rubles. Banks Russian sufficiently easily passed the crisis of liquidity. Fund index was increased by 20 percent, this only is less than in the past year, but in the past year there was generally record, and the generally stock market of Russia grows by record rates. 20 percent - very fair indicator.
Problems are also well known, the main thing of them - inflation. We did not succeed in manage holding of an inflation rate, and the growth rates in the inflation exceeded the expected parameters: instead of eight and one-half percentages it came out by 11,9. And this will be one of the most important tasks of government, all leadership of the country, first of all economic unit, down 2008 and the subsequent years - struggle with the inflation. Here this that I would wish to say against the beginning. More I will not you exhaust by long monologs and numbers. I please you, questions.
Leading: Associates, good day. Request to put to use microphone, to be represented. If you please, give let us begin. Alexander…
Alexander Gamow, “Komsomol truth”: Vladimir Vladimirovich, soon completes your second presidential period. What was, in your opinion, your principal success, your principal achievement against the post of President of the Russian Federation, and which did not come out that you do consider it your principal failure in these years? Thanks.
Putin: I see no serious failures. I will begin based on the conclusion of your question. All assigned missions are achieved. All stated goals are achieved. Tasks are carried out. It would be possible, probably something to manage more effective. Here I now spoke about inflation. It could be less. If they would perform, can, is more experienced and it is goal-directed, if all forces they guided down to this, would mobilize down this not only economic unit, but also community organizations, political structures. Why? Because this concerns including the expenditures of state. A question that these expenditures would be substantiated, and if we accelerate expenditures, we do not monitor their, then this general place, in reality, nothing here new I will say, then this is reflected before the inflation.
But there are and, of course, objective data. Here this influx of clean capital of the quotient, about which I spoke, partly it carries, of course, the so-called speculative nature. I place here nothing bad. No bad meaning. This is simple people, which play on the market and do not have down this of law, moreover, Russian economy in a certain sense even became for international capital calm harbor, stable situation both before the saving and before the political sphere; therefore capital here comes. But this is reflected before the inflation, just as the large number of petrodollars. As a whole, everyone after all and TsB, and government manages this task, although it is possible, probably much it would be to do still and additionally.





Natalia Melnikov, “independent newspaper”: Vladimir Vladimirovich, when you only became president… “Independent newspaper”, Natalia . When you became only president, you named yourselves the hired manager of vast corporation “Russia”, the assigned people. I wish in you to request, here here and now, before this audience, among the people, which you recently named your friends and associates: say honestly, here you itself you do consider a good manager? You did always make only correct decisions? Or there were such decisions, about which you do feel sorry? And nevertheless, in your view, client is satisfied by your work? Thanks.
Natalia Melnikov: You yourselves do consider a good manager?
Putin: I recently spent, in my opinion, one-and-a-half minutes minimum, and that two in order to answer approximately down that question, which you now again actually formulated. I am satisfied by the results of my work. I assume that the client - Russian people, the voter, who voted twice at the Presidential elections of the Russian Federation, as a whole were satisfied. About this they speak and opinion polls, and the level of the support of … of the acting beyond the given moment time of President of the Russian Federation.
Putin: Client as a whole is satisfied





Well and finally, then that we are not caught at the point of the past, but we think about the future, here this, it seems me, it is also very important. You for sure heard my action at the expanded conference of the Gossoviet, where I indicated the need for the innovation way of development. Indeed focus consists before the fact that we achieved much in the last eight years, but if we further will perform thus, we will arrive beside the irredundant situation. And we do not simply establish some things, besides which we must be proud in the past and about which we had to think in the future. We formulate these tasks, moreover sufficiently scale, without any exaggeration arrogant, and we show the route, along which we can achieve these goals. I.e., we look in the future. And it is very important in my view, this.
_________ _______
___urn





I on the soap looked on the news of translation… nothing new…
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[gagu911]

I on the soap looked on the news of translation… nothing new…
… hitching post about girl based on “” ")) saw… armature plate metal))
))

It looked translation across the canal of news.
New for itself nothing it opened for the whole day to conduct they were included on, so that outstanding events I have the opportunity to learn before the course of several minutes after moment x.
But she here once more comprehended that Putin in us politician with a healthy sense of humor. Response down a question of Canadians most of all smiled. On their uneasiness by the determination of our flag against the standard it will not prevent oil production to other countries. And the GDP , after smiling it is said, “do not be disturbed, everything will be normally. However, peace does not survive, that American flag on the moon they will insert, so you do not be disturbed…”
It was the pair of sharp responses about and Clinton. But the position of those did not require political correctness from our side…
Also confused statement about the redirection of rockets down , in certain cases. This is already the discovered statement of the president of the country about the announcement of America by country- threat. Count, their call was taken. Even when was taken relay before an arms race of such public statements was not. It is not too assured that we for this are ready. But let us look, which will be. Finally, this decision deliberate they mean they know that they make. Let us look how this will answer the West.

[dhI stutInt]

To me was pleased, new- old, but some of his responses not only caused smile, but also they forced it is proud besides the country…
Only should I pose question, type, but how this you are there proud? What in the country there are and without you know… but I it is disposed down the positive it means it (positive) will be…
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant





Only should I pose question, type, but how this you are there proud? What in the country there are and without you know… but I it is disposed down the positive it means it (positive) will be…
- ouch, … I give you to kiss beside all places many times!!!
… in any event, this was last of time of goodbye c of his side… and, certainly, this it had to be down 80% of , down 10% - program and down - it is unimportant… I wish to note, by the way that write the very even good authors. How much his it did not look - it always " gives on the ears”… Its one response about the wastes the sex of the minorities of what stands -”… I at the point of the demographic program… “. UV-f-f-f-f- f… but this was long ago…
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[Af dhI feef]

Only should I pose question, type, but how this you are there proud? What in the country there are and without you know… but I it is disposed down the positive it means it (positive) will be…

[gagu911]

… and can propose to Volodya to work after its presidency in Russia? ")

[dhI stutInt]

gugu911, propose.
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant

[Af dhI feef]

gugu911, Vladimir Vladimirovich, who does not know… This you there Yushchenko's your call, and you be good relate validly to our president! By the way, this concerns remaining. It to you not boon companion and not “fellow based on our yard”, but president. Have at least a respect (IMG: style_emoticons/default/)

[gagu911]

gugu911, Vladimir Vladimirovich, who does not know… This you there Yushchenko's your call, and you be good relate validly to our president! By the way, this concerns remaining. It to you not boon companion and not “fellow based on our yard”, but president. Have at least a respect (IMG: style_emoticons/default/)
. . to me your remark relates it must since in my country I I relate down the batch of regions, and constantly I vote at the point of the party of Victor Fedorovich !
so that, if you the sole batch in the Ukraine which approves the interrelations of the Ukraine and Russia! so that! ") do not tell me this, I so respect ..))





gugu911, propose.





well yes is agreeable… everything after all to seek their hero!)

[lAot]

answered well, not the fact that previous. especially Yeltsin shame and disgrace was. But here all briefly clearly deliberately and with the humor. On the whole the fine person Is , I am proud that this president!

[Af dhI feef]

… and can propose to Volodya to work after its presidency in Russia? ")
your post? Volodya - deferential attitude to the president, as you do think? He is your friend? Brother? But are encountered still “”, “”, “” and so forth I think not from the great mind so they write… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/)





. . to me your remark relates it must since in my country I I relate down the batch of regions, and constantly I vote at the point of the party of Victor Fedorovich !
Yes I not against , it is simple president in you thus far already Yushchenko, but , unfortunately no one.
I am proud by Putin! But you are proud by Yushchenko?

[SIleM]

In my opinion your buoy of honey is bored without my ladle of pitch!





Only should I pose question, type, but how this you are there proud? What in the country there are and without you know… but I it is disposed down the positive it means it (positive) will be…
It does not mean.





Siren, and anything ?
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[SIleM]

Desire without fail to be comforted, to maintain hope by any price, even price of the closure of eyes - wide and trampled down route, which leads down the religion.





I am proud by Putin! But you are proud by Yushchenko?
“A you was recorded by volunteer?” (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
But you do know that already did arise the sect of ? The present religious sect, where to it they do pray and they do consider it of god on the earth? (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)





Siren, and anything ?
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[SIleM]

Siren, and anything ?
Before my post there are no arguments, either old, or new; therefore a question I estimate as fault finding.
But if it would estimate otherwise, then it could answer: - A why? “Fool to learn - only to spoil” (popular wisdom). Nothing personal, ok?

[BrAktIk]

To . Rhyme me one strongly pleases, based on the student times.





And it is full of glad pictures.
Not because the peace is excellent,
But because I am cretin!
Nothing personal, certainly. Thus, it blew…

[SIleM]

Before my post there are no arguments, either old, or new…
- and not only before this concrete. Nothing personal, observation…
You and objectivity - “two things are inconsistent”





Before my post there are no arguments, either old, or new…
- and not only before this concrete. Nothing personal, observation…
You and objectivity - “two things are inconsistent”
- … is unproved… I speak, when to say something on , pass on the individual and to the offenses…
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[Af dhI feef]

In my opinion your buoy of honey is bored without my ladle of pitch!
Siren, after these words understandably which of the design dispute will not come out… I wash hands…
Deja vu…

[SIleM]

In my opinion your buoy of honey is bored without my ladle of pitch!
Siren, after these words understandably which of the design dispute will not come out… I wash hands…
Deja vu…
Dispute? But that, it was? Over-sweetness is one… Here exactly argue- that no one and desires, perhaps that, even then…





, pass on the individual and to the offenses…
As something?! Still as there is what! Yes I do not see meaning…
Individual your I respect, despite not on what. Already painfully you good read omasa and films you look (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
Maybe, and it was hasty. But this that?





Siren, and anything ?





Siren, and anything ?
… not provocation?
By the way, what offenses? “Fool to learn - only to spoil”? Why you did take this down your count?

[BrAktIk]

But this that?





Siren, and anything ?





Siren, and anything ?
… not provocation?
Angelic you have nature! So softly you formulate… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[gagu911]

of fief, there are no I of (it wrote based on the low letter since I consider this )… I voted at the point of …. therefore for me and for 15 million populations president ..!
to Yushchenko's I so count!





“Yushchenko - misunderstanding!” Propose slogan to our.
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[dhI stutInt]

Only should I pose question, type, but how this you are there proud? What in the country there are and without you know… but I it is disposed down the positive it means it (positive) will be…
It does not mean.





Why this does not mean? It means for me, I before this believe and it means it will be….You are surprised, that to me there is how to be proud? But perhaps besides something to be proud? But you are not proud besides your country? But besides whose country you are proud?
And then, based on what you did solve, that your negative is more objective than my positive?
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant

[Af dhI feef]

Fine person, , only to argue based on Siren, , verify… It has its, opinion about how everything is bad, even if everything is good… Well there is this type of people ("

[SIleM]

Fine person, , only to argue based on Siren, , verify… It has its, opinion about how everything is bad, even if everything is good… Well there is this type of people ("
But there is this type of people - by them spit before gas, and they all: “God dew!”
I consider that our state (not the country, you will notice, - this of thing different) to us with all precisely of beside the eyes. As precisely - already she wrote.
But which, perhaps all is good? (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
Yes, my opinion personal, but your no? But whose then?
But that such “to argue plainly”? When spore no and all do sing one song?

[BrAktIk]

I am disposed down the positive and it means it (positive) it will be…
It does not mean.
Why this does not mean?
Permit answering above sirens?
Because, the higher the level of waitings in ordinary people - the sicker the disappointment, when the level of prices of oil will become low, will be.





But you are not proud besides your country?
You do not assume that it is possible to simultaneously be proud besides the country, and to despise its authority?

[SIleM]

Why this does not mean? It means for me, I before this believe and it means it will be….You are surprised, that to me there is how to be proud? But perhaps besides something to be proud? But you are not proud besides your country? But besides whose country you are proud?
And then, based on what you did solve, that your the negative is more objective than my positive?
Well, purely logically it does not mean. If I do verify, that I bird, I will treat?
About the pride nothing she said, but yes, I am surprised. Although is already less (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) a quantity of those being being proud now more greatly astonishes.
I am not proud besides the country of my, yes even generally to me this feeling is not very understandable. To be proud, imho, is possible besides its acts. Strangers can be approved or not approved, be glad by them or be sad and the rest patriotism I feel only before at the point of the national sport commands, before the policy is not.
I do not consider it my views negative, I do consider it objective, yes indeed and you do also consider your objective, truth? This is subjective, although to argue it is possible, there would be desire.
But no one's besides the country I am proud. See above.

[gagu911]

steeply to you… as … and we have to .....





Because, the higher the level of waitings in ordinary people - the sicker the disappointment, when the level of prices of oil will become low, will be.
- and what “simple people” do refer to petroleum? They are stockholders? Workers? Who they? I have no to the petroleum, i.e., absolutely of any… i.e. to as even even 99% of inhabitants of our vast and immense. What waitings? That to you they home and they will say - here is the piece of verdure, this to you at the point of the petroleum, , ! So that- whether? And why petroleum? Why not forest, for example or why not the meeting of from the Kremlin? Or why not the picture Of gallery??? They are also completely tangible and completely it is possible to successfully sell them at the point of the very stocks and to successfully raise wage to the teachers in the particularly happy area of great and immense. And some will be as happy… .. of balls still proposed - everything to take and to share. Does not call to mind rhetoric? …
911… by the way, ... said “before the meeting”…
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[gagu911]

yes nothing… simply in you “he said ”, and I came out that the survey looked and they there specially stimulated attention before this… so, it was recalled…
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[TekoJEA]

Because, the higher the level of waitings in ordinary people - the sicker the disappointment, when the level of prices of oil will become low, will be.
- and what “simple people” do refer to petroleum? They are stockholders? Workers? Who they?
They are automobile enthusiasts (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) perhaps gasoline not of the petroleum do make? The prices besides the gasoline have to the simple people most straight direct relation.

[gagu911]

yes nothing… simply in you “he said ”, and I came out that the survey looked and they there specially stimulated attention before this… so, it was recalled…
… is actual not to magician even to that the GDP no longer first face of the country of your…. (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)

[dhI stutInt]

Well, purely logically it does not mean. If I do verify, that I bird, I will treat?
About the pride nothing she said, but yes, I am surprised. Although is already less (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) a quantity of those being being proud now more greatly astonishes.
I am not proud besides the country of my, yes even generally to me this feeling is not very understandable. To be proud, imho, is possible besides its acts. Strangers can be approved or not approved, be glad by them or be sad and the rest patriotism I feel only before at the point of the national sport commands, before the policy is not.
I do not consider it my views negative, I do consider it objective, yes indeed and you do also consider your objective, truth? This is subjective, although to argue it is possible, there would be desire.
But no one's besides the country I am proud. See above.
But logic here not with than… or you always harmony by algebra? Ability and desire to see good is here must…
Even before the dark times it is possible to find happiness, if we are turned down the light ()





This is subjective, although to argue it is possible, there would be desire.
If you consider that this is subjective, why you request about the objectivity?:





Because, the higher the level of waitings in ordinary people - the sicker the disappointment, when the level of prices of oil will become low, will be.
- and what “simple people” do refer to petroleum? They are stockholders? Workers? Who they?
They are automobile enthusiasts. Perhaps gasoline not of the petroleum does make? The prices besides the gasoline have to the simple people most straight direct relation.
- before the gasoline three selling prices + taxes, this is too far… + in any event, our were obligated to tighten the prices besides the gasoline to the level the European Union before the introduction in …





is actual not to magician even to that the GDP no longer first face of the country of your…
- Brezhnev's syndrome?
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[BrAktIk]

Because, the higher the level of waitings in ordinary people - the sicker the disappointment, when the level of prices of oil will become low, will be.
- and what “simple people” do refer to petroleum?
I weakly believe that you itself actually do not understand… It is faster, you include the same “fool” as with Ingushetia…
The first. For the country the level of prices of oil - huge portion of taxes, respectively - the income unit of the budget. The expenditures of budget depend on prices of oil not directly proportional, but to a considerable degree.
The second. Personally for you and me - the greater the money in the country (until today - this very closely down the words “the higher the level of prices of oil”), the greater the clients/of buyers. - It is so almost directly proportional for me.

[SIleM]

But logic here not with than…
It is sad…





Ability and desire to see good is here must…
This is rose-colored goggles…





If you consider that this is subjective, why you request about the objectivity?:
So you zh themselves declare about one-way recognition: positive - only one side of medal.
Subjectively our about its own objectivity. But you is objective already before the fact that you recognize his own nonobjectivity, see above. Although she wrote somewhere that exist… you apparently, consider it unessential. Here here and bifurcation. For me the outrages of the last years above the democratic institutions strongly re-weigh the doubtful successes of the same years. And I do not strain above itself in order to see poor. She would wish to see good, but I do not see… (Perhaps, standard of living it grew (not in me), so with the high prices of oil this is natural and temporarily).

[dhI stutInt]

But logic here not with than…
It is sad…





Ability and desire to see good is here must…
This is rose-colored goggles…





If you consider that this is subjective, why you request about the objectivity?:
So you zh themselves declare about one-way recognition: positive - only one side of medal.
Subjectively our about its own objectivity. But you is objective already before the fact that you recognize his own nonobjectivity, see above. Although she wrote somewhere that exist… you apparently, consider it unessential. Here here and bifurcation. For me the outrages of the last years above the democratic institutions strongly re-weigh the doubtful successes of the same years. And I do not strain above itself in order to see poor. She would wish to see good, but I do not see… (Perhaps, standard of living it grew (not in me), so with the high prices of oil this is natural and temporarily).
Siren, why it is sad? Really you all, which around you does occur logically you do interpret?
But as your love at the point of the husband? by what logic you it do gauge?
You know, I do not also strain above itself in order to see good, peace of , you prefer to look against one side of medal, I down another.
Apropos democratic ….I do not know what is democracy, except the transfer of this concept as the government by the people and some postulates, which not before one country perform.
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant

[SIleM]

Siren, why it is sad? Really you all, which around you does occur logically you do interpret?
But as your love at the point of the husband? by what logic you it do gauge?
You know, I do not also strain above itself in order to see good, peace of , you prefer to look against one side of medal, I down another.
Apropos democratic ….I do not know what is democracy, except the transfer of this concept as the government by the people and some postulates, which not before one country perform.
She knew that you will say about the love (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_) yes, feeling do not always yield to logic, there are pheromones etcetera. But it would be foolish, before the bed it was uninteresting, yes it would not fall in love me - hardly and I fell in love herself. so that down everything there are reasons.
To logically interpret all I try. It is not always received, so information is not sufficient.





Note, all Democratic countries with the length of service have high standard of living and its high duration…

[BrAktIk]

Apropos democratic ….I do not know what is democracy, except the transfer of this concept as the government by the people and some postulates, which not before one country perform.
Oh… here before what succeeded Putin authority - so this before the propaganda… It declared to fools, that we already live magnificently…
But clever it convinced besides the fact that is everywhere equal , and although the simulation of democratic institutions, so indeed and in them not it is ideal… You follow the hands of conjurer! Between the concepts “simulation”, and “not it is ideal” - in reality precipice… But, already almost all are convinced that - step…
It sometimes me even seems that the authority actually considers western democracies the same simulations, and Putin sincerely , that by Tony he does not wish to order English court to make an advantageous decision…
But democracy - is the formation, with which the opposition can arrive against the authority as a result of free elections.
For this is necessary “the formation with the feedback” -
the independent press + free elections = the feedback

[Af dhI feef]

Praktik, excuse, but on the basis of your post follows that I - the fool





It declared to fools, that we already live magnificently…
and you - clever





But clever it convinced besides the fact that is everywhere equal
it is not in my opinion somehow good at the point of others to determine status. Here only not necessary to speak something of the type of the fact that “I nothing determined, but each thought to the extent of of disorderliness”. It does not start.

[BrAktIk]

Praktik, excuse, but on the basis of your post follows that I - the fool





It declared to fools, that we already live magnificently…
and you - clever





But clever it convinced besides the fact that is everywhere equal
it is not in my opinion somehow good at the point of others to determine status. Here only not necessary to speak something of the type of the fact that “I nothing determined, but each thought to the extent of of disorderliness”. It does not start.





No, I about this classification at the point of “the clever” will not descend. Are faster - and . He thought - and you, but you itself reject (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
But I in no way think that and before the West is equal … I think that the precipice nevertheless it is necessary to surmount. When is finished the period of affirmations, that, this precipice - it does not exist. So that I - is faster “to in embassies”. It is only here - above free of charge. On the conviction.
I do not believe to this propaganda. As based on 14 years it did not believe to Soviet Union. You do think, me then little people it did learn the native land to love?

[Af dhI feef]

Praktik, is strange, with the reading of your post is represented reverse…

[dhI stutInt]

To . Rhyme me one strongly pleases, based on the student times.





And it is full of glad pictures.
Not because the peace is excellent,
But because I am cretin!
Nothing personal, certainly. Thus, it blew…





Oh… here before what succeeded Putin authority - so this before the propaganda… It declared to fools, that we already live magnificently…
But clever it convinced besides the fact that is everywhere equal , and although the simulation of democratic institutions, so indeed and in them not it is ideal…
'Praktik, thanks at the point of the fools… you do think, it did offend? In any way… to me to prove to you, that I never was flattered down the count of authority, apparently, uselessly… you nevertheless you will not verify… I already it wrote before the first post, that not worse you I know that in the country there are problems, but you to me based on Siren you prove, that I before the rose-colored goggles I am found. . impression that you consider that I live beside some to the particular zone, where the rolls on the trees grow and by roses they … and I such flutter as butterfly without the concerns and the troubles… you make mistakes. . me even husband not oligarch. Apropos high prices of oil. To me personally, beside the pocket percentages of sale to petroleum do not drip, but as auto-owner, I feel a price hike besides the gasoline… but, in contrast to you, I do not intend to see only poor… I do not see meaning. In contrast to you, Siren, I do not see meaning all to interpret logically. .?
So that there are no reasons to cry, there is no occasion for the sad thoughts
Now us it can save only heart, because mind no longer saved us.
But about democracy. Siren, dear, and describe- kiloamperes to me about democracy in the very Democratic country of world….When you have a good sleep, certainly… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant





But democracy - is the formation, with which the opposition can arrive against the authority as a result of free elections.
- … Basic word “can”. In us in the country also “can”. Let it come…





in me even husband is not oligarch…
- it , acknowledge… But how you do live?
In you by strange mode was added clearly the preconception that to you someone something must…

[BrAktIk]

it requested 2 weeks - reveal holy riddle… but besides admonitions, what itself must be conjectured - nothing it heard.
Well, this your based on the sirens of disassembly, not with me. I visited about its reference down the site of the Central Election Commission. It shared, that she spoke, were obtained presence and percentage of those voted at the point of . It came out - as before the times of inviolable bloc of Communists and non-party people.
It did not begin to publish, she did not wish once. But before what was problem for you the same do? Instructions zh was about the type " take meat dumpling before the left hand” (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)





Here now did appear new plug - to refer in mysterious Ingushetia… no one nothing will mysterious… nevertheless comprehend, it is correct? It is very convenient.
This I on the congenital delicacy did not begin they to call to mind from “Medvedev…” “I did not vote” about the share in Ingushetia, which you first named “share before the support of Putin”, then said that in the Caucasian republics such before principle cannot be, clearly by including “fool” (), and by being lazy glanced beside (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)





Praktik, I even do not wish this to consider… Here petroleum does cost 100 , to you from this warmer? Yes , nevertheless inflation 12% as the minimum, so that stands petroleum of 1000 or 10 to you personally there is no difference… Your buying and trade ability stably falls.
I spat down the prices. In autumn it arrived based on the world championship, it visited beside the magazine, it gasped, and it raised the prices besides its services. To me is important effective demand. It on petroleum matters depends unambiguously. - Faster also beside my use it depends from the consumer prices. People hurry to be invested before my long-playing services, until the prices grow.
Petroleum it is more expensive - the more the madly rich. It means, more than servants around them will feed. It means, more than clients against me will arrive.





Praktik, is strange, with the reading of your post is represented reverse…
No, I think that we strongly lag as the West. Although, of course, it is considerably less than with the Soviet Union…
Again I apologize myself at the point of the ambiguous form of words.





Basic word “can”. In us in the country also “can”. Let it come…
Ridiculous to consider… you did not see before western democracies of the accession to power of opposition?
Do not amuse! And even in the countries of the type of Poland such already occurred: were relieved right-left- right…

[Af dhI feef]

Praktik, excuse, and as you did wish, from the Soviet Union and immediately beside democracy? I think first it is necessary that before the brains something it bridged in the course of time, certainly. Europe and America not ten years and not decades dispatch to by so-called democracy, but at this time first tsars, then chiefs. But now everyone wishes to fall asleep and to awake “as before Europe”. There is no already, untimbered shaft. Do remember, probably”… we let us go by different way… “? They arrived… now conversely and forward! It will not come out through the precipice. Only in the turning movement. As all normal people…

[BrAktIk]

'Praktik, thanks at the point of the fools… you do think, it did offend? In any way… to me to prove to you, that I never was flattered down the count of authority, apparently, uselessly… you nevertheless you will not verify… I already it wrote before the first post, that not worse you I know that in the country there are the problems
Of course not, I you exactly carry down the people, which are comforted by the fact that “and in them it is bad”, preferring not to note precipice… i.e., to “convinced clever”.
You before this theme in a human manner speak, one of few. Give, . Thus, I based on 14 years did not love authority, and the more he learned about it - the more it did not love. But it wished!
It loved the country, language loved, and terribly it survived, where my his, country they dragged.
And when were begun changes in Gorbachev/Yeltsin - I by soul thawed. Although he understood, that 15-20 years will be strongly more badly. Is unavoidable with the revolution. Was much poor, very much. But system correct as far as the construction was constructed. And saving based on the policy to was driven off. Therefore they suffered without the catastrophes of large scales the default of 98 years…
Yeltsin was absolutely strange to me on the spirit of men (besides the fact that leader… and the skilled worker of sport…), but the direction, before which went the country, heated soul. Well, and the scale of individual… recall: much it with itself did give? By they only and reproached…
Compare the assemblage of geniuses, who shared entered once the cooperative lake… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
I understand, which you is desirable, in spite of much, to feel hope - such, as I felt during Yeltsin's lifetime. Your law, that here you will say.

[dhI stutInt]

it , acknowledge… But how you do live?
Lover tosses up…





before what? And who to you did say that the notorious “West” - this is mold curve?





and that? Well, they vary Bush of the most junior at the point of or on Clinton. What will be changed? Before what the meaning of movements?
I here also cannot comprehend, why western model down itself fit?
But about the selections… simply, it is ridiculous, really you, Praktik you do actually believe that based on a change in the places of terms the sum is changed?
- creep,
volute, across the slope Of .
Upward, to the heights themselves!
, the son of the peasant

[SIleM]

So that there are no reasons to cry, there is no occasion for the sad thoughts
Now us it can save only heart, because mind no longer saved us.
You know, it seems to me that this of the word of desperation. I thus far did not despair.





But about democracy. Siren, dear, and describe- kiloamperes to me about democracy in the very Democratic country of world….When you have a good sleep, certainly… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
Do not become similar To , if you please. Answer the question:

[BrAktIk]

Praktik, excuse, and as you did wish, from the Soviet Union and immediately beside democracy? … Through the precipice it will not come out. Only in the turning movement. As all normal people…
in the turning movement, but must be surmounted to vanish, it is correct? And to prove to be, where now those, which did not roam… Well , with this rhetoric I would be absolutely agreeable.
Us- that they tell another. That they strayed in the same swamp as we. Yes even generally, in reality otherwise as before the swamp, and live- that is impossible… And precipice to not necessary, we in general already near…

[SIleM]

But democracy performs, of course, everywhere, where it there is. Before what you do see its inaction? Maybe, you do have in mind its ineffectiveness? Then before what questions?
(, practice decomposed my statement (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_). )
But this is the question, down which I please to answer .





Compare the assemblage of geniuses, who shared entered once the cooperative lake… (IMG: style_emoticons/default/icon_)
You, practice, do not be carried off. I doubt, that she will comprehend, about which speech. This to you all is obvious…