The Legal Implications Of Battered Woman Syndrome

Let’s examine the legal implications of Batteredis she took a life. He received no trial for his crime.
Woman Syndrome. BWS was first proposed in thePerhaps she did what she felt she needed to do, but
1970’s. According to Joe Wheeler Dixon, PhD, JDshe must also take responsibility for her actions.
BWS appears to be the product of legal advocacyIn court, expert testimonial regarding domestic
and not science. BWS seems to owe its existence toviolence can by used for various purposes: to
the needs of legal advocates to support and justifydemonstrate the defendant is a battered woman, to
claims by battered women who have killed (theirexplain an abused woman’s state of mind and/or
batterers). The defense revolves around theconduct or to support a claim or the validity of a
woman’s mental deficiency and helplessness.particular defense. Experts have acknowledged that
Learned helplessness can be induced in lab animals,Battered Woman Syndrome is considered a
but no sudden rage or aggression.subcategory of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, but
So, a battered woman kills her abusing husband. Shenot a mental disease in the context of insanity.
doesn’t do it during a beating, thereby being ableAccording to Mary Ann Dutton, Ph.D.’s "Critique
to claim self defense; she probably can’t,of the Battered Woman Syndrome" Expert
he’s too strong. While he is awake and watchingtestimonial concerning battering and its effects
her, she suffers from learned helplessness; he hascannot adequately rely on a single construct such as
brainwashed her into thinking she is helpless andBattered Woman Syndrome: the comprehensive
worthless. She perhaps she kills him in his sleepbody of existing knowledge cannot be so condensed.
because that’s the only time she can overpowerInstead focus should be on identifying the specific
him.questions relevant to the issues at hand for which
This is where the battered woman syndrome camethere is a body of knowledge to support a valid
into play. Her defense claims it was a form of selfconclusion.
defense. Where one might agree with that, the fact