Massachusetts Child Custody Grandmother Visitation Protective Order Lawyers Attorneys

ORRINA TURNER vs. DENISE LEWIS.In interpreting the term "related by blood" this court
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTSconcludes that the parties are "related by blood." The
June 15, 2001paternal grandmother, through her son, is "related by
Facts:blood" to the child. Likewise, the child and her mother
The plaintiff in this case is the paternal grandmotherare "related by blood."  Thus, the child is "related by
of a ten year old child, whose parents were neverblood" to both parties, making the mother and
married. The grandmother has custody of the child,grandmother "related by blood" through that child. 
and the child resides with her. The child's motherWhen grandparents are charged with the
presently has visitation rights with the child, althoughresponsibility of caring for their grandchildren, they
she does not pay child support to the grandmother. must often face "the biological parents' frequent
On September 2, 1999, the mother entered theresentment of the grandparental custody, and/or
grandmother's home and yelled for the child. Thetheir jealousy of the attention being paid by their
grandmother told her that the child was not at home.parents to their offspring."  Because of the parental
When the grandmother then attempted to descendhostility that may accompany grandparental custody,
the stairs, the mother blocked her, and punched andit is imperative that caregivers like the grandmother in
pushed her up against the wall, causing thethis case be protected from such domestic abuse by
grandmother's head to hit a windowsill. Thec. 209A.  For these reasons, this Court concludes
grandmother subsequently filed a pro se complaintthat the grandmother and the defendant are "related
against the mother for protection from abuse underby blood," and that the Probate and Family Court's
G. L. c. 209A. Although a Probate and Family Courtruling contravenes "the Commonwealth's public policy
judge granted the grandmother an emergencyagainst domestic abuse -- preservation of the
protective order, another Probate and Family Courtfundamental human right to be protected from the
judge declined to extend that order, because shedevastating impact of family violence."
found that the "parties are not related by blood,Accordingly, this court vacates the denial of the
marriage or household membership" as required byextension of the protective order, and the denial of
the statute. The grandmother filed a timely notice ofthe motion for reconsideration, and remands these
appeal and also filed a motion for reconsideration,cases to the Probate and Family Court for an order
which was denied. She appealed the denial ofconsistent with this opinion.
extension of protective order.Disclaimer:
Issue:These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law
- Whether the abuse was perpetrated by a "familyGroup.  They represent the firm's unofficial views of
or household" member?the Justices' opinions.  The original opinions should be
Discussion:consulted for their authoritative content.