| Normal 0 RESEARCH PAPER | | | | 12 |
| ON | | | | Job Security |
| JOB SATISFACTION OF CALL CENTER EMPLOYEES | | | | 2.03 |
| ABSTRACT | | | | 13 |
| Job satisfaction plays a vital role in life of man, | | | | From Table - 2, it is observed that salary is rated |
| because it affects positively on the personal and | | | | highest for providing job satisfaction. The nature of |
| social adjustment of the individual. On the contrary | | | | the job with its scope for creative execution finds a |
| job dissatisfaction adversely affects on the physical | | | | higher rating compared to the issues like job security. |
| and mental health of the individual. The relationship | | | | Extended working hours and fear of loss of job due |
| between job satisfaction and employee's | | | | to venture failure creates the highest dissatisfaction |
| performance has always been discussed in | | | | with rating scores below the average values. |
| organisational behaviour and human resource | | | | Table: 3 Mean differences in overall job satisfaction |
| management literature. A highly satisfied employee | | | | according to some personalfactors. |
| need not necessarily be a profound performer. | | | | |
| However, an employee, who is dissatisfied, can cause | | | | Groups |
| irreparable damage to the orgnisational effectiveness. | | | | Mean |
| Performance management system should be based | | | | S.D.tp |
| on ideological underpinnings and a holistic context by | | | | Age up to 25 years |
| strengthening the linkages among the key | | | | 63.62 |
| components such as performance planning, | | | | 7.00 |
| performance execution, performance appraisal, | | | | 0.08 |
| recognition and reward, and performance | | | | N.S. |
| improvement on a continuous basis. The paper | | | | Age above 25 years |
| discusses performance management and job | | | | 63.33 |
| satisfaction of call center employees in Indore. | | | | 7.94 |
| Present study is based on the primary data collected | | | | Experience up to 1 year |
| from 188 call center employees through a pre-tested, | | | | 65.18 |
| structured, comprehensive questionnaire. The key | | | | 10.21 |
| issues were identification and definition of key | | | | -1.95 |
| performance areas, role clarity and direction, | | | | Experience above 1 year |
| performance feedback and potential appraisal, and | | | | 65.48 |
| job rotation as a powerful tool to develop and | | | | 6.32 |
| unleash employee's potential. Factor analysis | | | | -1.96 |
| highlighted the significance of three sub-systems of | | | | < .05 |
| performance management system, i.e., performance | | | | Female |
| planning and development, employee involvement and | | | | 64.14 |
| empowerment, and organisation-employee rapport. | | | | 6.08 |
| The paper concludes that the conducive and | | | | -3.3 |
| congenial physical, social, and psychological conditions | | | | N.S. |
| present in the workplace have potential to enhance | | | | Male |
| the job satisfaction of the call center employees. | | | | 64.65 |
| Introduction: | | | | 7.00 |
| Job satisfaction is a complex phenomenon, because | | | | Married |
| it is related to various casual factors like personal, | | | | 63.62 |
| social, cultural, environmental and financial. The | | | | 7.61 |
| nature of the job is an important factor in deciding | | | | Unmarried |
| the level of job satisfaction of employees. More | | | | 62.28 |
| important is the long-term prospect of employment in | | | | 8.43 |
| the organization that, which creates a sense of | | | | -0.10 |
| involvement and commitment to the job among | | | | N.S. |
| employees. | | | | From the analysis of table - 3 it is evident that there |
| Job satisfaction is an individual's attitude towards the | | | | is no significant influence of personal factors on the |
| job or it is an individual's reaction to the job itself. | | | | overall job satisfaction except experience. |
| Job satisfaction is also a positive emotional state that | | | | Table: 4 Level of satisfaction with various aspects of |
| when a person fulfill his needs and aspirations. Job | | | | job: |
| satisfaction may be general or specific. Many | | | | Aspects of job |
| factors influence job satisfaction of the employees. | | | | Percentage ofsatisfiedemployees |
| First and most important determinant is supervision | | | | Percentage ofdissatisfiedemployees |
| and style of leadership. Employee oriented | | | | Chi |
| leadership styles enhances a greater amount of job | | | | Squarep |
| satisfaction. On the other hand production oriented | | | | Job Security |
| leader may cause low job satisfaction. Job content | | | | 56 |
| factors like achievement, responsibility, recognition | | | | 94 |
| and advancement leads to job satisfaction.. | | | | 6.76 |
| Job satisfaction is intrinsic as well as extrinsic in | | | | < .01 |
| nature. A satisfied employee derives his level of | | | | Working Hours |
| satisfaction from various sources. It is a feeling of | | | | 70 |
| affiliation that he drives out ofhis job context and | | | | 80 |
| the context in which he operates the job. There are | | | | 1.96 |
| various definitions of job satisfaction. The resultant | | | | NS |
| psyche leads to higher level of involvement, greater | | | | Job Status |
| degree of participation, greater cost consciousness | | | | 60 |
| and timely maintenance of job schedules. Locke | | | | 90 |
| (1976) defined job satisfaction as a pleasurable | | | | 4.00 |
| emotional state resulting from the perception of | | | | <.05 |
| one's job as fulfilling one's important job values, | | | | Salary |
| provided these values are compatible with one's | | | | 120 |
| needs. Job satisfaction is the most widely researched | | | | 30 |
| subject in the area of human resource management. | | | | 33 |
| According to an estimate of Locke (1976) about | | | | <.01 |
| 4000 articles have been published till 1976 in the area | | | | Working |
| of job satisfactions. Yet there is perhaps not a single | | | | Condition |
| area in social science fraught with ambiguity or | | | | 45 |
| conflicting opinion of methodological nuances than the | | | | 105 |
| work satisfaction. Paradoxically there are very few | | | | 16 |
| areas more researched than Job satisfaction. | | | | <.01 |
| Brayfield-Rothe (1951) used a scale to measure | | | | Recognition for |
| overall job satisfaction. This scale contains 18 items in | | | | Good Work |
| relation to job satisfaction put in a semantic five | | | | 101 |
| point scale (strongly agree, agree, not sure, disagree, | | | | 49 |
| and strongly disagree). So the possible total scores | | | | 6.76 |
| varied from 18 to 90 with the undecided or neutral | | | | <.01 |
| point at 45. A total score above neutral point explains | | | | Participatory |
| ‘ satisfaction' and below is the level of | | | | Management |
| dissatisfaction. The degree of satisfaction can be | | | | 90 |
| observed from the relative distance of the | | | | 60 |
| respondents from the neutral points. | | | | 4.84 |
| As stated , large number of studies have been | | | | <.05 |
| conducted on job satisfaction. These studies have | | | | Peer Group |
| brought variations in findings of job satisfactions and | | | | Relation |
| also on the context of the job behavior. In the earlier | | | | 99 |
| decades of study, Rothisberger and Dickson (1939) | | | | 51 |
| found no clear relationship between job satisfaction | | | | 7.84 |
| and performance whereas Vroom (1964) found a | | | | <.01 |
| very weak relationship between job satisfaction and | | | | Open |
| turnover. Studies conducted in the eighties and | | | | Communication |
| nineties found out that job factors are not | | | | 94 |
| unidirectional in their effects. They served to be both | | | | 56 |
| sources of positive and negative satisfaction. The | | | | 6.76 |
| personal factors like skill, experience, education, | | | | <.01 |
| mental health have a significant influence on the | | | | Work |
| overall job satisfaction. The latter studies have also | | | | Autonomy |
| identified that job security, recognition for good work | | | | 102 |
| and good environment are treated as more | | | | 48 |
| important than promotion making. These findings are | | | | 5.76 |
| mostly observed in technology driven and heavy | | | | <.01 |
| equipment industries like computers, satellite, four | | | | Behavior of |
| wheeler industries. | | | | Boss |
| The important factors identified in the earlier studies | | | | 105 |
| related to job satisfaction are the poor working | | | | 45 |
| condition, peer group behavior, routine nature of the | | | | 14.44 |
| job and the working hours. These particular findings | | | | <.01 |
| from the majority of the researches conducted in | | | | From the analysis of Table - 4, it is found that a |
| westernbusiness environments were typically from | | | | significant percentage of the respondents were |
| software based industries and business operating | | | | dissatisfied with job security, job status, working |
| with severe time constraints, stiff deadlines and | | | | hours, working condition. On the other hand, it is |
| varying work order In contrastlack of alternative job | | | | observed that a high percentage of respondents are |
| opportunity, job insecurity, profit centered company | | | | satisfied on parameters like salary, recognition for |
| policies withlimited employee welfare orientation, | | | | good work, peer group relation, work autonomy and |
| absence of recognition were major causes of | | | | behavior of boss through participatory management |
| dissatisfaction . | | | | style and the facility of open communication with the |
| Job satisfaction leads to various problems. Some of | | | | boss. |
| these are absenteeism, turnover and negative | | | | Table 5: Level of satisfaction with family and social |
| publicity. Absenteeism is inversely related to the | | | | life of call center employees |
| level of job satisfaction. Job dissatisfaction produces | | | | Factor |
| a lack of will to work and forces the employee to go | | | | Percentage ofsatisfiedemployees |
| away from work as far as possible. It is also | | | | Percentage ofdissatisfiedemployees |
| found that dissatisfied worker quit the job over time | | | | Chi-squarep |
| and seek satisfaction elsewhere. | | | | Family life |
| Objectives of the Study: | | | | 39 |
| To find out the level of job satisfaction of call center | | | | 111 |
| employees. | | | | 23.04 |
| To find out the level of job satisfaction of male and | | | | <.01 |
| female call center employees. | | | | Social life |
| To study overall job satisfaction according to some | | | | 30 |
| personal factors. | | | | 120 |
| To study level of satisfaction with various aspects of | | | | 38.44 |
| job. | | | | <.01 |
| To study level of satisfaction with family and social | | | | From the analysis of table No.5, it is observed that a |
| life of call center employees. | | | | majority of the respondents are dissatisfied with |
| The Brayfield - Rothe Scale of 18 items was used. | | | | their family and social life. These may be attributed |
| The scale for Perceived Importance of Job Facets | | | | to the fact of extended working hours, non-regular |
| was used to measure relative importance of the | | | | life style and work pressure reflected in social |
| specific job factors. Specific aspects of the job | | | | behavior of the call center employees. |
| (functional commonalities were associated and | | | | Table 6: Correlation between job satisfaction and |
| attempts were made to keep the nature and | | | | performance of respondents |
| hierarchial diversity of job content to possible | | | | |
| minimum) in the form of fourteen items were given | | | | No. of respondentsrtp |
| in a five point scale. A pilot study over a small sample | | | | 150 |
| (respondents known to the researcher and whose | | | | .69 |
| opinion are not accounted for in the latter study) | | | | 2.80 |
| was undertaken to modify the questionnaire. A split | | | | <.01 |
| -Half technique tested the reliability of the | | | | From tale - 6, it is found that there is a significant |
| questionnaire where the reliability coefficient (0.75) | | | | positive correlation between job satisfaction and |
| was statistically significant. A part of the questionnaire | | | | performance. The sense of accomplishment due to |
| also covered the job facets and life satisfaction | | | | project mode of operation and creative execution is |
| components covering job related factors and | | | | one of the factor responsible for the high correlation |
| personal factors. In this section the first part covered | | | | between job satisfaction and performance. |
| ten factors concerning the satisfaction regarding | | | | Table 7: Correlation between job satisfaction and |
| specific aspects of the job. The response pattern | | | | perception of job security of the |
| was in a dichotomous format. The question related | | | | Call center employees |
| to satisfaction with family and social life were also | | | | No. of respondentsrtp |
| put in dichotomous format with options of | | | | 150 |
| satisfaction / dissatisfaction. Open-ended questions | | | | - .31 |
| were put to supplement the exploration through | | | | 2.85 |
| structured questionnaire and to understand the major | | | | <.05 |
| causes of job dissatisfaction. | | | | The result from the table - 7 reveals that there is a |
| Results: | | | | significant negative correlation between the level of |
| Some of the relevant and significant results of the | | | | satisfaction and perception of the employees on the |
| study are presented in the followingtables. | | | | job security. The concept of high volatility of call |
| Table 1: Level of satisfaction with the job and the | | | | center business has gone in to the mind of |
| organization | | | | employees for which their apprehensions regarding |
| Respondent's | | | | tenure of job in the life of the company has a |
| With the job | | | | negative correlation. |
| With the institute | | | | Table 8: Correlation between Job satisfaction and Job |
| Satisfaction | | | | status |
| 109 | | | | No. of respondentsrtp |
| 37 | | | | 150 |
| Dissatisfaction | | | | - .45 |
| 41 | | | | 2.69 |
| 113 | | | | <.01 |
| The results from the table shows that majority | | | | Though call center are offering an exorbitantly |
| respondents (73%) are satisfied with the job they | | | | high salary structure, the respondents did not find the |
| are doing whereas a majority (75%) is dissatisfied | | | | usual job status associated with the salary. So we |
| with the organisation in which they are working. This | | | | observe job satisfaction having a negative correlation |
| finding is self-contradictory. As an explanation it is | | | | with job status. |
| observed that the nature and content of the job is | | | | Table 9: Important causes of job dissatisfaction as |
| the driving fore behind satisfaction whereas the | | | | perceived by the call center employees |
| apprehensions and operational problems for long term | | | | Causes of Dissatisfaction |
| survival of the institute are the indicators of | | | | Percentage |
| dissatisfaction. | | | | Volatile Nature of Industry |
| Table: 2 The mean ranks and rank orders of the | | | | 73% |
| college professors, assistant professors and lecturer's | | | | Turn Around of Venture Capitalists |
| ratings ofperceived importance of specific job | | | | 70% |
| aspects to the overall satisfaction. | | | | Faulty Business Model |
| Aspects of job | | | | 68% |
| Mean Ranks | | | | Market non-responsiveness |
| Rank Orders | | | | 60% |
| Salary | | | | Lack of Job Security |
| 4.14 | | | | 60% |
| 1 | | | | Lack of Job Status |
| Autonomy in Operation | | | | 59% |
| 4.08 | | | | Problem of Family & Social Life |
| 2 | | | | 57% |
| Recognition for Good Work | | | | CONCLUSION: |
| 4.02 | | | | The present study highlights some of the major |
| 3 | | | | reasons for creating job dissatisfaction among call |
| Desired Job | | | | center employees. Although conventional sources of |
| 4 | | | | dissatisfaction like salary, promotion, security, |
| 4 | | | | autonomy for work are not relevant in call center |
| Opportunity for | | | | business but the level of satisfaction is limited due to |
| Compensatory Overtime | | | | some emerging phenomenon like volatile industry |
| 4 | | | | structure, flat organizational design, literally a |
| 4 | | | | non-responsive market and other allied factors. So |
| Open Communication | | | | the probability of managing these dissatisfaction |
| 3.92 | | | | indicators at the organization level seems a remote |
| 5 | | | | solution. The intervention of psycho-social machinery |
| Job Status | | | | for creation of intra-organisation and inter-industry |
| 3.88 | | | | job confidence is the call of the day for increasing |
| 6 | | | | job satisfaction levels in the call center industry. |
| Participatory Decision | | | | References |
| Making | | | | 1. Gadel M.S.(1953): Personnel Psychology, volume 6. |
| 3.85 | | | | 2. Hertzberg F., Mausner, B., Peterson, R.O. Capwell, |
| 7 | | | | D.F. (1957), Job Attitudes : Review of Research and |
| Work Autonomy | | | | Opinion. Pittsburg : Psychological Service of Pittsburg |
| 3.80 | | | | 3. Katzell R.S.(1964): Personal values, job satisfaction |
| 8 | | | | and job behaviour. |
| Working Environment | | | | 4. Nicholson , N; Broon, C.A. and Shadwick - Jones, |
| 3.77 | | | | T.K. (1977) Absence from workand personal |
| 9 | | | | characteristics, Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, |
| Relation with Colleagues | | | | (315-327). |
| 3.61 | | | | 5. Wernimont P.F.(1966): intrinsic and extrinsic factors |
| 10 | | | | in job satisfaction and jobinvolvement. Abnormal |
| Job Variety | | | | psychology, vol 50. |
| 2.66 | | | | Keywords: Performance planning, performance |
| 11 | | | | appraisal, job satisfaction, employee involvement, |
| Working Hours | | | | employ's empowerment, congenial conditions. |
| 2.51 | | | | |