Compensation claims are only for the innocent.

Shareyear, appeal court judges ruled in favour of Stephen
The Home Office announced last week thatMiller who had spent four years in prison based on a
innocence and ‘not guilty’ are not one andwrongful conviction. But the award was for only
the same and this can affect the amount of£55,000 which was described as “irrationally
compensation given to those who have been falselylow” by campaigners. An independent assessor,
imprisoned.Lord Daniel Brennan QC agreed with this remark and
It has been revealed that the Ministry of Justice willrecommended an increased award for Miller.
not pay compensation to a man who was wronglyCampaigners have always found the compensation
convicted and spent six years in jail for murder. Thisclaim guidelines to be used unfairly, and often argue
decision was based on the fact that he was notthat decisions such as those made above, can
“clearly innocent”.undermine judges and juries.
This has been highlighted in the case of the formerHarry Fletcher, of the National Association of
school teacher, Sion Jenkins, whose claim forProbation Officers, said: "It seems to me that the
£500,000 was refused by the government. Jenkinsabsolute minimum is paid to people and as many
had been jailed for the murder of his fosterdeductions as possible are made, quite apart from
daughter, but due to a quashed conviction and twothe time people have to wait. When someone is
retrials with hung juries, Jenkins was released.cleared of a crime, they just walk out through the
Officials have said that the Court of Appeal havecourt doors, they don't qualify for probation support
very clear guidelines as to when compensation is due.or assistance. It's not just the finances, there's no
These guidelines cover situations such as theassessment of their needs and it is extraordinarily
introduction of new evidence which later provesdifficult for people to adapt.
innocence and not instances where the prosecution"The Home Office clearly thinks that Jenkins was
simple has a weak case.freed on a technicality, which doesn't mean he's
Paying compensation for miscarriages of justice hasinnocent, but that's not for them to decide. It's fairly
always been highly controversial. For example, lastshameful for them to think they overrule a court.