Colon Cancer Kills Woman After Doctor Missed It During Three Colonoscopies

Men and women with a family background of colonascending colon and cecum as the scope could not
cancer as well as people with symptoms are atbe passed beyond the transverse colon. Yet, the
higher risk of getting colon cancer. The mainphysician who carried out the three colonoscopies
procedure used by doctors to check for colon cancerand followed the woman throughout this period
when an inidividual has a family history or reports acontinued telling her that her problems were as a
symptom, like blood in the stool, is the colonoscopy.result of hemorrhoids.
Using this procedure doctors can visualize the insideEventually the patient went through exploratory
of the colon and search for the presence ofsurgery as a way to figure out the reason why she
abnormal (and possibly cancerous) growths. Besideswas suffering from the symptoms. The cancer was
testing patients who are at an increased risk level,discovered during the surgery. The cancer had grown
physicians additionally typically advocate thatand spread so far that the patient had to have a
asymptomatic men and women who are fifty orlarge fraction of her intestines removed and then also
older undergo routine screening in order to discoverneeded to endure treatment with chemotherapy.
any cancer that might be growing in the colon beforeSadly, even with treatment she passed away from
it reaches an advanced stage.the cancer. Because of the physician's failure to order
Yet in order to be reliable a colonoscopy needs to beadditional testing to determine the source of her
complete. It should cover the total span of the colon.symptoms given that there were two incomplete
Among the reasons why a doctor may not finish thecolonoscopies the woman’s surviving family
colonoscopy is inadequate prior preparation resultingpursued a lawsuit. The law firm handled the matter
in inadequate visualization or the presence of anwas able to report that they were able to get a
obstruction which makes it impossible to pass therecovery for the family in the amount of $875,000
scope beyond the area of the obstruction. IfDoctors use diagnostic tests so as to discover or rule
situations like these occur the doctor should informout certain diseases. For example, the colonoscopy is
the patient and recommend that the person eithera procedure used to locate or exclude colon cancer.
undergo an alternative procedure or a repeatBut the test is only as good as the accuracy with
colonoscopy. A failure to do so may lead to a missedwhich the test was carried out. For the procedure a
cancer which could grow and progress to anphysician inserts a scope to see the inside of the
advanced stage prior to being found.colon so as to ascertain whether there are polyps or
This is what happened in one published claim involvingtumors in the colon
a 54 year old female who passed away fromWhen the complete colon is not visualized, as in the
metastatic colon cancer. Look at her medical history.lawsuit above, a physician cannot rely on it to
The woman had a family history of colon cancer.exclude cancer. Doing so makes about as much
During the length of six years, physicians did 3sense as only listening to one of your lungs,
colonospies on her. On many occasions she keptexamining only one of your eyes, or ordering only
letting her doctors know that she was experiencingpart of a complete blood count. When the patient
pain in the abdomen and that she found blood in herdoes have cancer this may lead to a delay in
stool. Besides the symptoms described above, herdiagnosis that gives the cancer time to grow and
doctors, on at least one occasion, additionallyadvance to an incurable stage. In a situation like that
observed that she had a third symptom of colonthe physician who counted on such a partial
cancer - she had anemia.procedure might be liable under a medical malpractice
The notes from 2 of the colonoscopies highlightedor even wrongful death claim.
that there was incomplete visualization of the