A Theoretical Model of Spouse Abuse by Christian Fundamentalists

Some time ago, I decided to conduct a study to5. Fundamentalist churches can hardly be called
determine if Christian fundamentalist menbastions of the principles of non-resistance and
represented a population with an increased likelihoodnon-violence. They don't support a "gentler way."
of engaging in domestic violence. I had determined to6. Fundamentalists are quick to support coercive and
complete a literature review and then proceed tolethal means of punishment such as corporal
interview counselors from a crisis center offering helppunishment for children, punitive civil justice, and,
to women experiencing abuse. It seemed like a goodultimately, the death penalty.
"plan of attack," and was straightforward and could7. Fundamentalists tend to support a position of civil
be easily interpreted.retributive justice as opposed to distributive or
Two problems, however, stood in the way of myrestorative justice.
research. I teach at a college and had easy access to8. Fundamentalist churches take passages concerning
many psychology and sociology databases. The firsta wrathful God at face value.
problem I encountered was that the literature was9. Many of these principles are preached on a regular
sparse and inconclusive at best. In general, littlebasis from fundamentalist pulpits.
difference could be found in abusive patterns10. Sadly, somehow, fundamentalist churches,
represented by the liberal religious, the nonreligious,husbands, boyfriends, and preachers manage to
and fundamentalists. Second, what little interviewing Ibrainwash women into thinking this system is from
did resulted in no "clear cut" pattern of religiousGod and that it is in their best interest.
affiliation among abusers. In fact, I found that11. All of this points to a subculture that is
variable often to be unaddressed or indeterminate-i.e.male-dominant, rigidly authoritarian, obedient to
in general, it could only be "guessed at" or inferred.religious leaders, and fairly accepting of violence as a
I found this puzzling, as I could certainly think of amethod of social/personal control.
theoretical model of abuse at least somewhat fueledTaking the above observations as reasonably
by fundamentalist belief. The variety ofaccurate, it is easy to construct a theoretical model
fundamentalism I had in mind was not the moreof wife abuse at the hands of a fundamentalist
"cultic" variety, but that represented by many folks'husband. In fact, a simple example illustrating that
neighbors and coworkers-a biblical absolutism andmodel can be given in just a few short paragraphs.
literalism that lead to an authoritarian and hierarchicalImagine that a wife doesn't go along with a husband's
view of marriage, decidedly male dominated.decisions. Or, imagine that she stops believing in the
Examples of abuse of both children and spousesmale authority point of view. You can see how that
already existed in more extreme groups. (For a chillingmight cause a quandary for a fundamentalist husband.
account, read Under the Banner of Heaven). Further,He's been told repeatedly that he is "in charge." He
as has been discussed on many on-line forums and inhas been told that this position is given to him directly
responses to my blog (where I have posted much ofon the authority of God. Likely, the wife has agreed
the evidence gathered from my earlier literatureto be submissive, if the marriage took place when
review), as well as support groups and other venues,they were both fundamentalist adherents. Also, he is
there is much anecdotal evidence that supports theprobably getting regular "booster shots" of the
prevalence of spousal abuse among fundamentalists.authoritarian dribble at church and from coreligionists
In saying that my literature review producedon a regular basis. Divorce is taboo, or close to it.
inconclusive results, I want to expand on what I thinkMight not such a husband become very agitated,
"inconclusive" means and doesn't mean. First, myfrustrated, and angry? Additionally, might he not view
review DID NOT deal with fundamentalism of thehis anger as a type of righteous indignation? In such a
more cultic variety. I think there is little doubt aboutcase, is it not possible that something just "snaps"
that one. As has been stated crazy, sectarian,and he lashes out at his wife? Perhaps physically, but
fundamentalist religious groups (such as polygamousif not, certainly with all kinds of psychological pressure
Mormons) are clearly wife abusers. They seem to beand abuse?
unrepentant about it. They think it's just part of life.This may be a phenomenon very difficult to
Men in such groups seem to believe that they havedocument empirically because it depends on
the prerogative to abuse women.self-report regarding both behaviors and religious
But, my interest is elsewhere. My work related tobeliefs. I believe that this was the downfall in my
fundamentalism has always dealt with fundamentalismoriginal methodology. Since my original decision to
as it is represented in popular culture. My attempt isstudy this phenomenon, I have been devising a
to paint an accurate picture of everyday,different way to go about things. It just stands to
garden-variety fundamentalism-- like that of thereason that research to this point would tend to be
Christian radio "family life experts," the many popularinconclusive. It is likely that many men (and women)
televangelists, or maybe "the little church down thewould be rather guarded and reticent to "come clean"
road" where your next-door neighbors attend. I haveabout it all. How much are fundamentalist adherents,
always been interested in that population, likelyeither abusers or the abused willing to disclose? The
because I was once a part of it.approaches taken thus far have relied, at least in
So, here is the evidence, as I know it:large measure, on precisely on such self-report.
1. In fundamentalism, men are seen as authorityStill, I do know from my history among the
figures.fundamentalists that abusive scenarios have been
2. Women are expected to "submit" to theirplayed out in tragic scenes spurred on by pathological
husbands-- a promise my wife wrote into her vowsreligious devotion. I do not say that such abuse is
when we were married 32 years ago.frequent. I do, however, believe that fundamentalist
3. Women are, for all practical purposes, second-classindoctrination and belief makes domestic violence a
citizens.more likely occurrence.
4. Men are encouraged to "take charge."